Hi
is there a patch how checks if the incomming server
has an existing ptr ?
I found a tcpserver patch here : http://www.gentei.org/~yuuji/software/qmpatch/
has somebody tried this patch anytime
??
regards rene
The tcpserverpatch is needed for this so called
"badmail" patch ..
- Original Message -
From:
Rene
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 12:36
PM
Subject: [toaster] PTR Test
Hi
is there a patch how checks if the incomming
serv
Rene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> Hi
>
> is there a patch how checks if the incomming server
> has an existing ptr ?
>
> I found a tcpserver patch here :
Similar functionality is already on mfcheck patch.
--
Eero
___
Sitefactory Webmail, http://www.sitefac
But imho mfcheck didn't check wether there excists a ptr entry for an ip
adress.
mfcheck checks only if the senderdomain is an existing one.
rene
- Original Message -
From: "Eero Volotinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 2:20 PM
Subject: Re
http://inter7.com/?page=simscan worth of trying.
--
Eero
Eero Volotinen wrote:
http://inter7.com/?page=simscan worth of trying.
Sounds like qmailscanner with per-domain processing and not as much
support for other AV softwares... Written in C as well which should
make it faster...
Anyone running this that can comment? Is it that much faster than qma
Rene wrote:
But imho mfcheck didn't check wether there excists a ptr entry for an ip
adress.
mfcheck checks only if the senderdomain is an existing one.
If you require a PTR record for all mail servers, you will reject a lot
of legitimate mail.
Regards,
Bill
Jason,
It looks good to us, however we don't want to reject based on
SpamAssassin results. Right now we use qmailscanner, which does slow
things down quite a bit and a C alternative that does a SMTP deny based
on ClamAV, and not SpamAssassin would be preferred. Anyone know of a
solution that
Peter Maag wrote:
Jason,
It looks good to us, however we don't want to reject based on
SpamAssassin results. Right now we use qmailscanner, which does slow
things down quite a bit and a C alternative that does a SMTP deny
based on ClamAV, and not SpamAssassin would be preferred. Anyone know
o
On Sep 29, 2004, at 9:16 AM, Peter Maag wrote:
It looks good to us, however we don't want to reject based on
SpamAssassin results. Right now we use qmailscanner, which does slow
things down quite a bit and a C alternative that does a SMTP deny
based on ClamAV, and not SpamAssassin would be pref
Bill and Tom,
Thanks for the replies. I don't think I was very clear in my first
message. I would like ClamAV to scan and block at the SMTP level, but
have SpamAssassin run as it normally does with QmailScanner, after the
message has already been accepted. From briefly looking over simscan,
Peter Maag wrote:
Bill and Tom,
Thanks for the replies. I don't think I was very clear in my first
message. I would like ClamAV to scan and block at the SMTP level, but
have SpamAssassin run as it normally does with QmailScanner, after the
message has already been accepted. From briefly looki
Peter Maag wrote:
Jason,
It looks good to us, however we don't want to reject based on
SpamAssassin results. Right now we use qmailscanner, which does slow
things down quite a bit and a C alternative that does a SMTP deny
based on ClamAV, and not SpamAssassin would be preferred. Anyone know
o
Hi all,
I just determined that pop3ds is not working at all here...
Apparently the script calls several parameters for stunnel that are no
longer available in stunnel? I have the stock pop3ds run file from the
toaster which assumes stunnel 3.x ... I'm running stunnel 4.x ...
Anyone know h
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
Hi all,
I just determined that pop3ds is not working at all here...
Apparently the script calls several parameters for stunnel that are no
longer available in stunnel? I have the stock pop3ds run file from
the toaster which assumes stunnel 3.x ... I'm runn
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 20:04, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just determined that pop3ds is not working at all here...
> Apparently the script calls several parameters for stunnel that are no
> longer available in stunnel? I have the stock pop3ds run file from the
> toas
Jason,
We have had the same problem with a Redhat 9 machine of ours. We have
just kept stunnel at 3.x , would also like to know how to get things
operational with stunnel 4.x
Peter
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
Hi all,
I just determined that pop3ds is not working at all here...
Apparen
Bill Shupp wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01098.html
Bill
Awesome, thanks... I should have checked the archives... Doh!
I still can't get this to work though It appears to negotiate
ciphers, then it just sits there... I have debug=7 so I can see
everything, but sti
I setup a new toaster and don't know why I can't send emails from Outlook.
When I do "qmailctl" I get following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# qmailctl stat
/service/qmail-send: up (pid 1723) 762 seconds
/service/qmail-send/log: up (pid 1725) 762 seconds
/service/qmail-smtpd: up (pid 1719) 762 secon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# qmailctl stat
/service/qmail-send: up (pid 1723) 762 seconds
/service/qmail-send/log: up (pid 1725) 762 seconds
/service/qmail-smtpd: up (pid 1719) 762 seconds
/service/qmail-smtpd/log: up (pid 1731) 762 seconds
messages in queue: 8130
messages in queue but not yet preproce
Noel,
Try doing a:
cat /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current
and
cat /var/log/qmail/current
These are the log files associated with most qmail deliveries and are
usually quite helpful in letting you know exactly what is going on.
Hope this helps,
Peter
Noel Sanchez wrote:
I setup a new toaster and d
On Sep 29, 2004, at 12:37 PM, Peter Maag wrote:
Bill and Tom,
Thanks for the replies. I don't think I was very clear in my first
message. I would like ClamAV to scan and block at the SMTP level, but
have SpamAssassin run as it normally does with QmailScanner, after the
message has already been
Spud,
Good point...I overlooked that aspect of things. I will give it a try
later this evening, and will post the results to the list. If this is
indeed true it will make life much better without perl and qmailscanner
(no hard feelings toward Perl).
Peter
a.h.s. boy (lists) wrote:
On Sep 29,
a.h.s. boy (lists) wrote:
On Sep 29, 2004, at 12:37 PM, Peter Maag wrote:
Bill and Tom,
Thanks for the replies. I don't think I was very clear in my first
message. I would like ClamAV to scan and block at the SMTP level,
but have SpamAssassin run as it normally does with QmailScanner,
after th
I don't understand, I looked at those 2 log files and this is a portion of
it, The messages in the queue keep increasing fast. It seems like this
mail server is being used for spam? This is a new toaster on Fedora core2
behind a linux firewall with ports 80, 25, and 110 being forwarded to the
mail
Noel,
What are the IP's of the mail server? I would shut down the port 25
forward to see if that slows things down. Make sure you followed the
toaster install instructions correctly, as you may have forgotten to
stop the server functioning as an open relay.
Thanks,
Peter
Noel Sanchez wrote:
26 matches
Mail list logo
