Hi
I want to use rblsmtpd, and this is my run script without rblsmtpd. It
works just fine!
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
QMAILDGID=`id -g vpopmail`
HOSTNAME=`mail.domain.com`
MAXCONCURRENCY=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
exec softlimit -m 2000 \
tcpserver -vR -l "$HOST
Hello,
I installed a new version of netqmail-1.05 with the 'Large Qmail patch' but
SMTP-AUTH isn't working.
I took a new
netqmail-1.05 and only aplied the 'Large qmail patch' without errors.
compiled without errors, installed and started the daemons. There were no
startup errors.
When I try to
I can't see why it's not working either. The only difference I have in
mine is I don't use the -b and -a args. Mine is simply:
/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -r bl.spamcop.net \
-r sbl.spamhaus.org \
Why not try that. If that works then add the -b and see if that
works then the -a. It look
One more thing. I also don't have the sinle quotes(' ') around here:
'/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
/var/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /usr/bin/true 2>&1'
But I'm using an older toaster so I don't know if it's that either.
Lars E. D. Jensen wrote:
Hi
I want to use rblsmtpd, and this is my run script witho
Try something like this.
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -S -l 0 -c 20 -x
/home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILES
How do I implement SSL+SMTP-AUTH in netqmail-1.05 + vpopmail 5.4.3?
I've done the make cert and all the control files necessary but I don't know
how to get the clientca.pem .
When we use make cert what CA are we using? How do I obtain its key? SMTP-AUTH
(Login, Plain and CRAM-MD5) is working wel
Hi
It was the recordio which was wrong in my own run script file.
I simply removed sh -c (shell)...
Thanks for all your run scripts, nice to have when tweaking :)
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Lars E. D. Jensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shane Chrisp wrote:
Try something like this.
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`i
Hi
Maybe a stupid question, but do I have to rename qmail-smtpd-chkusr in
order to get the chk-user patch to work?
And how can I see if emails are denied?
--
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Lars E. D. Jensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 19:55, Lars E. D. Jensen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Maybe a stupid question, but do I have to rename qmail-smtpd-chkusr in
> order to get the chk-user patch to work?
>
> And how can I see if emails are denied?
Hi,
renamed not needed. Just apply the right patch (mysql or cdb).
And yo
I'm using the process gleaned from Bill's Qmail Toaster, with one
exception -- the new version of vpopmail 5.4.5.
I altered the configuration to put vpopmail in /var/vpopmail, changed
the vpopmail user's home dir to /var/vpopmail, and even edited the
conf-vpopmail file that came out of the chku
>I altered the configuration to put vpopmail in /var/vpopmail, changed
>the vpopmail user's home dir to /var/vpopmail, and even edited the
>conf-vpopmail file that came out of the chkuser patch so that it looks
>for /var/vpopmail instead of /home/vpopmail.
>
>Viewing and receiving email works ju
On Jun 29, 2004, at 11:13 AM, Darius Wei wrote:
I altered the configuration to put vpopmail in /var/vpopmail, changed
the vpopmail user's home dir to /var/vpopmail, and even edited the
conf-vpopmail file that came out of the chkuser patch so that it looks
for /var/vpopmail instead of /home/vpopm
All of a sudden this weekend the remote concurrency started topping out. We
tried raising it to 30 then to 40 and now it is at 50 but it is still
staying at the peak and users are complaining that their email is being
delayed by a few hours. The queue has also jumped by 20%. I know this is
off
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 15:14, Jeff Koch wrote:
> All of a sudden this weekend the remote concurrency started topping out. We
> tried raising it to 30 then to 40 and now it is at 50 but it is still
> staying at the peak and users are complaining that their email is being
> delayed by a few hours.
This seems to be a problem with the outgoing remote concurrency. I'm not
sure how this would be related to a tarpit attack. However, we have a
standard toaster install - is the tarpit patch automatically turned on?
Also, since we've got the 'big concurrency' patch is there any problem with
rais
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 16:35, Jeff Koch wrote:
> This seems to be a problem with the outgoing remote concurrency. I'm not
> sure how this would be related to a tarpit attack. However, we have a
> standard toaster install - is the tarpit patch automatically turned on?
I don't believe it is... You
Hi Jason:
Thanks for the help. What exactly does 'tarpit' do? Something with a delay?
At 04:47 PM 6/29/2004, you wrote:
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 16:35, Jeff Koch wrote:
> This seems to be a problem with the outgoing remote concurrency. I'm not
> sure how this would be related to a tarpit attack. Howev
17 matches
Mail list logo