[toaster] maildirsize updates (not)

2004-05-14 Thread David M. Shirley
Ok, I can't figure out what is going on. I have the latest toaster install up and working fine but maildirsize doesn't seem to keep up with incoming email. What exactly is supposed to cause maildirsize to be updated? Does it happen each time an email is delivered? maildirsize is being writte

Re: [toaster] maildirsize updates (not)

2004-05-14 Thread Bill Shupp
David M. Shirley wrote: Ok, I can't figure out what is going on. I have the latest toaster install up and working fine but maildirsize doesn't seem to keep up with incoming email. What exactly is supposed to cause maildirsize to be updated? Does it happen each time an email is delivered? mai

Re: [toaster] maildirsize updates (not)

2004-05-14 Thread Bill Shupp
Bill Shupp wrote: I'm not a procmail patch for Maildir++. Not sure what I was thinking there.. this should read: "I'm not aware of a Maildir++ patch for Maildir++ support". Sorry. Bill

Re: [toaster] maildirsize updates (not)

2004-05-14 Thread David M. Shirley
No, no maildrop. It's a virgin toaster straight from your http://www.shupp.org/toaster/ page. Nothing optional was added except for one thing: I substituted qmail-toaster-0.6-1+greylisting.patch for the qmail-toaster-0.6-1.patch.bz2 patch. After making that sustitution I could apply the chk

Re: [toaster] maildirsize updates (not)

2004-05-14 Thread Bill Shupp
> No, no maildrop. It's a virgin toaster straight from your > http://www.shupp.org/toaster/ page. Nothing optional was added except > for one thing: > > I substituted qmail-toaster-0.6-1+greylisting.patch for the > qmail-toaster-0.6-1.patch.bz2 patch. After making that sustitution I > could appl

Re: [toaster] maildirsize updates (not)

2004-05-14 Thread David M. Shirley
Hmm. It does seem to get updated if squirrelmail deletes a message. The problem appears to happen when qmail delivers a message to an alias for that box. Perhaps my qmail-local is not patched for Maildir++ support. Is that patch included in the qmail-toaster-0.6-1+greylisting.patch? Your s

Re: [toaster] maildirsize updates (not)

2004-05-14 Thread Bill Shupp
> Hmm. It does seem to get updated if squirrelmail deletes a message. > The problem appears to happen when qmail delivers a message to an alias > for that box. > > Perhaps my qmail-local is not patched for Maildir++ support. Is that > patch included in the qmail-toaster-0.6-1+greylisting.patch?

Re: [toaster] maildirsize updates (not)

2004-05-14 Thread David M. Shirley
Maildirsize is owned thus: -rw-r--r--1 vpopmail vchkpw196 May 14 12:52 maildirsize qmail-local runs as vpopmail, still no updates are made. I checked the qmail-toaster-0.6-1+greylisting.patch and it DOES contain the Maildir++ patch. The patch applied fine but how can I verify th

Re: [toaster] maildirsize updates (not)

2004-05-14 Thread Tom Collins
On May 14, 2004, at 1:41 PM, David M. Shirley wrote: @400040a5282721710af4 delivery 453: success: user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/home/vpopmail/domains/ DOMAINREMOVED/postmaster//did_0+0+1/ @400040a5282721712e1c status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 @400040a52827217135ec end msg 3

Re: [toaster] maildirsize updates (not)

2004-05-14 Thread David M. Shirley
I can confirm from experiments today that catch-all mail is definitely NOT counted in quotas. I thought that qmail-local did the delivery for catchalls but maybe I am mistaken. Does vdelivermail place mail in Mailbox dirs directly or does it call one of the qmail programs to handle the deliver

Re: [toaster] maildirsize updates (not)

2004-05-14 Thread David M. Shirley
I just confirmed that all aliased mail IS being counted in the quota. The problem seems to lie purely in the quota counts on CATCHALL emails. Can anyone else confirm this behavior? On Friday, May 14, 2004, at 04:43 PM, Tom Collins wrote: Perhaps there's a bug in vdelivermail where it doesn't cou