hi all,
I'm trying this in 2 different stock RH 7.3 boxes, following Bill's steps
with the latest snapshot of courier-imap:
tar -xjf tar/courier-imap-2.2.2.20040207.tar.bz2
cd courier-imap-2.2.2.20040207
# build as vpopmail
chown -R vpopmail:vchkpw ../courier-imap-2.2.2.20040207
su vpopmail
# co
Abel Lucano wrote:
hi all,
I'm trying this in 2 different stock RH 7.3 boxes, following Bill's steps
with the latest snapshot of courier-imap:
tar -xjf tar/courier-imap-2.2.2.20040207.tar.bz2
cd courier-imap-2.2.2.20040207
# build as vpopmail
chown -R vpopmail:vchkpw ../courier-imap-2.2.2.2004020
>The only thing 2.2.1 is missing is vlimits support. That's why I used
>the pre-release. Hopefull this will be fixed by the final
>release. It
>does work fine on RH 9, fwiw.
>
I have compiled courier-imap-2.2.2.20040118 on RH7.3 and its running fine.
I used the following to compile.
./confi
I agree - we needed to use --with-redhat on an RH8.0 installation.
At 01:12 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
hi all,
I'm trying this in 2 different stock RH 7.3 boxes, following Bill's steps
with the latest snapshot of courier-imap:
tar -xjf tar/courier-imap-2.2.2.20040207.tar.bz2
cd courier-imap-2.2.2.
Jeff Koch wrote:
Does anybody have any suggestion for improving the performance of a
mailserver runnning
qmail/vpopmail/qmailadmin/qmail-scanner/spamassassin? We're using a
2.4Ghz P4 with 1GB RAM and a 40GB SCSI drive. The operating system is a
basic RH8.0 install with the ext3 journalling fil
Hi Bill:
Thanks for the reply.
I know how to run mysql from another server but how would one move spamd
and clamd to another server? Your other suggestions are good but we're
using a 1U rack server that unfortunately has room for one drive (big
mistake!).
At 02:44 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
Jef
Jeff,
We had a similar problem, and our bottleneck was SpamAssassin and Clam
Scanner. We ended up putting SpamAssassin and Clamd on a seperate
machine that simply scanned the incoming messages and passed them onto
the primary mail machine that housed the vpopmail accounts, etc.
All you need
Peter Maag wrote:
Jeff,
We had a similar problem, and our bottleneck was SpamAssassin and Clam
Scanner. We ended up putting SpamAssassin and Clamd on a seperate
machine that simply scanned the incoming messages and passed them onto
the primary mail machine that housed the vpopmail accounts,
On Feb 27, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Bill Shupp wrote:
The one thing that you can lose by doing this is chkuser support. Two
workarounds are to use MySQL w/ valias support, or perhaps share the
mail spool via NFS.
Mailing lists aren't stored in MySQL, even with valias support turned
on. I have ideas o
Hi Peter:
I was thinking of that also. But didn't you lose the benefit of 'checkuser'
patch. We have one domain that used to have a catch-all and now gets 40,000
spams a day addressed to every possible name. We shut down the catch-all
and the checkuser patch rejects them all saving us all kind
Jeff,
Yes, as Bill pointed out we do loose the benefit of the checkuser patch,
but many of our users use catch-all accounts. So, in that respect there
really was no downside in not going with the chkuser patch(unless I am
mistaken, and it works with catchalls).
Peter
Jeff Koch wrote:
H
Tom Collins wrote:
On Feb 27, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Bill Shupp wrote:
The one thing that you can lose by doing this is chkuser support. Two
workarounds are to use MySQL w/ valias support, or perhaps share the
mail spool via NFS.
Mailing lists aren't stored in MySQL, even with valias support turne
Does anyone know of a patch that would allow the mailserver to reject
emails/attachments over a certain size?
Best Regards,
Jeff Koch
Jeff,
That functionality is built into QMail. Edit/Create the file:
/var/qmail/control/databytes
Enter a value in there in bytes(i.e. my max is 5MB so it reads: 500)
Thats it!
Peter
Jeff Koch wrote:
Does anyone know of a patch that would allow the mailserver to reject
emails
We thought about using valias support but even with that mailinglists and
autoresponders addresses would be missed. NFS mounting of /home/vpopmail
always seems a little risky to us. We're going to try mirroring via rsync
just the top couple of levels of the /home/vpopmail/domains directories so
Has anyone ever tried this - is it a reliable solution? do the servers bog
down waiting for NFS repsonses?
At 06:04 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
Tom Collins wrote:
On Feb 27, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Bill Shupp wrote:
The one thing that you can lose by doing this is chkuser support. Two
workarounds are t
Does anybody have any suggestion for improving the performance of a
mailserver runnning qmail/vpopmail/qmailadmin/qmail-scanner/spamassassin?
We're using a 2.4Ghz P4 with 1GB RAM and a 40GB SCSI drive. The operating
system is a basic RH8.0 install with the ext3 journalling file system.
We're ha
17 matches
Mail list logo
