[toaster] qmail-smtpd-viruscan-1.3.patch

2004-02-12 Thread Mike McCallister
Greetings, I am a big fan of this patch: http://qmail.org/qmail-smtpd-viruscan-1.3.patch Since installing it, me and about 2000 others stopped getting MS viruses/worms. I am currently in the process of migrating a mail server over to new hardware and thought I would see what was new in the qm

Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-viruscan-1.3.patch

2004-02-12 Thread Bill Shupp
Mike McCallister wrote: Greetings, I am a big fan of this patch: http://qmail.org/qmail-smtpd-viruscan-1.3.patch Since installing it, me and about 2000 others stopped getting MS viruses/worms. I am currently in the process of migrating a mail server over to new hardware and thought I would se

Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-viruscan-1.3.patch

2004-02-12 Thread Tom Collins
On Feb 12, 2004, at 9:45 AM, Bill Shupp wrote: My recommendation is to use the qmail-scanner/clamav solution rather than this virus patch. Netqmail already comes with the qmailqueue patch, which is required for qmail-scanner to work. And clamav already had MyDoom added to its virus definitions

Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-viruscan-1.3.patch

2004-02-12 Thread Bill Shupp
Tom Collins wrote: On Feb 12, 2004, at 9:45 AM, Bill Shupp wrote: My recommendation is to use the qmail-scanner/clamav solution rather than this virus patch. Netqmail already comes with the qmailqueue patch, which is required for qmail-scanner to work. And clamav already had MyDoom added to

Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-viruscan-1.3.patch

2004-02-12 Thread Mike McCallister
Thank You Bill and Tom, I guess I should use a "real" virus scanner - blocking win32 executables certainly won't stop a macro virus etc. I am impressed with clamAV - very speedy and easy to update virus signatures. Plus it has a nifty RPM that sets everything up for you in one command. I hav