I see what you're saying. Well, when I use an "&", I get an error
message kicked back of "no user by that name". Also, I think I
mentioned this before, but we are currently using the pipe "|" and its
working with other usernames in their .qmail files for forwarding
functions.
On Fri, 2003-06-2
On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 09:52 AM, John Shireley wrote:
I understand that, but for some reason this is the way we've always
done
it. It works, so I never questioned the practice. Ok, testing this
again, it seems like if I only have one address in there it only
delivers the message once, cor
I understand that, but for some reason this is the way we've always done
it. It works, so I never questioned the practice. Ok, testing this
again, it seems like if I only have one address in there it only
delivers the message once, correctly. But if I have more than one addy
in there, the messag
On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 07:46 AM, John Shireley wrote:
No, I meant the pipe symbol "|". I'm not using any of the virt stuff,
its pretty much a straight /etc/passwd installation. Oddly enough I've
been trying to duplicate this by just using my own address and can't
seem to get it to do it ag
No, I meant the pipe symbol "|". I'm not using any of the virt stuff,
its pretty much a straight /etc/passwd installation. Oddly enough I've
been trying to duplicate this by just using my own address and can't
seem to get it to do it again, whereas my original group of usernames
received somethin
