On Jun 30, 2004, at 7:39 AM, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 18:12, Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi Jason:
Thanks for the help. What exactly does 'tarpit' do? Something with a
delay?
Yeah, basically, if qmail sees mail coming from the same source (not
sure what's considered a source),
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 18:12, Jeff Koch wrote:
> Hi Jason:
>
> Thanks for the help. What exactly does 'tarpit' do? Something with a delay?
Yeah, basically, if qmail sees mail coming from the same source (not
sure what's considered a source), it will pause for a configurable
number of seconds befor
Hi Jason:
Thanks for the help. What exactly does 'tarpit' do? Something with a delay?
At 04:47 PM 6/29/2004, you wrote:
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 16:35, Jeff Koch wrote:
> This seems to be a problem with the outgoing remote concurrency. I'm not
> sure how this would be related to a tarpit attack. Howev
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 16:35, Jeff Koch wrote:
> This seems to be a problem with the outgoing remote concurrency. I'm not
> sure how this would be related to a tarpit attack. However, we have a
> standard toaster install - is the tarpit patch automatically turned on?
I don't believe it is... You
This seems to be a problem with the outgoing remote concurrency. I'm not
sure how this would be related to a tarpit attack. However, we have a
standard toaster install - is the tarpit patch automatically turned on?
Also, since we've got the 'big concurrency' patch is there any problem with
rais
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 15:14, Jeff Koch wrote:
> All of a sudden this weekend the remote concurrency started topping out. We
> tried raising it to 30 then to 40 and now it is at 50 but it is still
> staying at the peak and users are complaining that their email is being
> delayed by a few hours.
