Re: [toaster] Syncdir

On 1/25/2005 7:16 PM, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: Hello Adam, Wednesday, January 26, 2005, 12:52:27 AM, you wrote: Here is the description of the issue I found: "Qmail was designed for BSD-like filesystems. And it is unreliable under Linux because it assumes tha

Re: [toaster] Syncdir

Adam Woodbeck wrote: Here is the description of the issue I found: "Qmail was designed for BSD-like filesystems. And it is unreliable under Linux because it assumes that link() is a synchronous operation. This is not the case with EXT2 and ReiserFS. So you have to apply this patch

Re: [toaster] Syncdir

On 1/25/2005 3:31 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Bill Shupp wrote: Adam Woodbeck wrote: I've been running Matt Simerson's FreeBSD qmail toaster for several years now and I'm getting ready to build a linux toaster.  I've been warned of queue problems when running qmail under linux

Re: [toaster] Syncdir

Bill Shupp wrote: Adam Woodbeck wrote: I've been running Matt Simerson's FreeBSD qmail toaster for several years now and I'm getting ready to build a linux toaster. I've been warned of queue problems when running qmail under linux due to the way linux handles fsyncs. I did some searching and

Re: [toaster] Syncdir

Adam Woodbeck wrote: I've been running Matt Simerson's FreeBSD qmail toaster for several years now and I'm getting ready to build a linux toaster. I've been warned of queue problems when running qmail under linux due to the way linux handles fsyncs. I did some searching and found that if I in