Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 10:36 PM
To: toaster@shupp.org
Subject: Re: [toaster] Patching
Tom Collins wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
>
>> patch -p0 < patch.file
>>
>> etc
>>
>> You might want -p0
Tom Collins wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
patch -p0 < patch.file
etc
You might want -p0 or -p1 depending on the patch type. You might or
might not want to be in the same directory as the original files
depending on the patch type.
I always like to include the '--dry-
On Apr 4, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
patch -p0 < patch.file
etc
You might want -p0 or -p1 depending on the patch type. You might or
might not want to be in the same directory as the original files
depending on the patch type.
I always like to include the '--dry-run' option to patch
Michael Di Martino wrote:
I know this is not the right list but my google searchs have come up empty.
What is the proper syntax for patching code (software) on linux.
For example I trying to patch mess833 but I havbe is the patch code.. How is
that patch applied?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Micha
John McCullough wrote:
Iâd like some patches to the netqmail (from http://www.netqmail.org)
package and Iâm having some problems. If this is not the right place
for this query, please redirect me. Thanks.
The patches Iâd like to add to the netqmail package are:
The SPF patch
> I tried to patch the files that need patching. and I got this:
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tar]# patch < daemontools-0.76.errno.patch
>
> can't find file to patch at input line 4
>
> Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
>
> The text leading up to this was:
try patch -p0 <
You can look in all the error.h files for a
line that says
extern init errno;
remove it and towards the top you will see
the all the includes and stuff well at the
end of that put this
#include
I Think this is all the patch
does...
- Original Message -
From:
Gilber
