Hello,
i read your page, you have right i have debian a this is solution
thank you again.
and i will try your latest toaster patch ;)
2007/4/27, Bill Shupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Lampa wrote:
> Hello, i 've little problem some smtp server(remote) can sent to my
> smtp server (local) emails.
>
>
Lampa wrote:
> Hello, i 've little problem some smtp server(remote) can sent to my
> smtp server (local) emails.
>
> here is errror mesage from remote server:
> Reporting-MTA: dns; xxx.xxx.xx
> Arrival-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:52:03 +0200
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Final-Recipient: RFC822; [
Juan Jose Miquel wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I’m trying to understand a little bit more about the qmail-tls.patch.
>
> Reading the initial documentation Frederic, he names a DEBUG option for
> further logging information, but I don’t know where to invoke this option.
>
>
>
> Could someone tel
On Dec 13, 2005, at 10:47 PM, Ismail YENIGUL wrote:
I want to use TLS and SMTP Auth functionality on qmail. But I need a
restriction for clear text SMTP Auth. I would like to disable
plaintext authentication methods (PLAIN, LOGIN) on my SMTP server for
unencrypted (non-SSL/TLS) sessions. But I
Patrick Brannen wrote:
After fresh Toaster install, everything works very well, except I cannot
connect using TLS. I've installed Shupp's qmail toaster using pop
before smtp before, but this is my first time using SMTP-AUTH.
When trying to connect with TLS, Thunderbird gives the error "unable
Neofema s.r.o. - tech wrote:
Hi,
I followed toaster but found one problem last day.
One user is trying to send me a message but an error message is returned.
Here it is:
The important part is here:
>>> STARTTLS
<<< 454 TLS missing certificate: error:02001002:system library:fopen:No
such file or d
Jason:
ok, thanks for the aclaration.
regards,
Ingo Claro
-Mensaje original-
De: Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Lunes, 04 de Abril de 2005 13:18
Para: toaster@shupp.org
Asunto: Re: [toaster] TLS connect failed
Ingo Claro wrot
Ingo Claro wrote:
>David:
>
>but isn't the communication still in port 25? What config requires the
>firewall?
>
>
Some firewalls, most notably the Cisco PIX, like to "fix-up" the SMTP
protocol for you. And if you're not aware of it, it's a real pain ...
>atte,
> Ingo Claro
>G
Abril de 2005 12:44
Para: toaster@shupp.org
Asunto: RE: [toaster] TLS connect failed
Cool. Quite likely, the firewall between that server & the internet is not
configured to allow TLS thru.
Cheers,
david
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Claro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Cool. Quite likely, the firewall between that server & the internet is not
configured to allow TLS thru.
Cheers,
david
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Claro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 12:34 PM
To: toaster@shupp.org
Subject: RE: [toaster] TLS connect fa
David:
that was it! i get the following:
250-TLS
250-HELP
250-STARTTLS
250-DSN
250-SIZE 2048
250-8BITMIME
250 PIPELINING
starttls
220 Ready to start TLS
Connection closed by foreign host.
the server closed the connection inmediatly after doing the starttls. So
it's a problem in the other ser
Bill Shupp wrote:
Did you setup the temp rsa/dh keys? If not, then they are created on
the fly during the smtp session, and will kill your system. do "make
tmprsadh" in the netqmail source, and make sure they are readable by
the user that qmail-smtpd runs as (my toaster patch chowns them to
v
s. "
- Original Message -
From: "Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [toaster] TLS Delays?
> Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
>
did you forget to set up a cron job for update_tmprsdh ?
- Original Message -
From: "Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [toaster] TLS Delays?
> Jason '
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using the smtpauth and tls patch located here :
http://shupp.org/patches/netqmail-1.05-tls-smtpauth-20040705.patch
I'm seeing significant delays (20-30 seconds) when sending mail
from both Thunderbird and Evolution. These delays only occur whe
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using the smtpauth and tls patch located here :
http://shupp.org/patches/netqmail-1.05-tls-smtpauth-20040705.patch
I'm seeing significant delays (20-30 seconds) when sending mail
from both Thunderbird and Evolution. These delays only occur whe
Greylisting patch observation:
I tried removing qmail-envelope-scanner to bypass greylisting, qmail-smtpd seems
to crash when a server connects with TLS. The connecting server has this error
on the log:
@400040743d3c1e892574 delivery 89: deferral:
TLS_connection_to_207.xxx.xxx.xxx_died:_error
Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti :
> Hi Bill,
>
> I tried to chmod all pem files to 777 just to check on the permissions but
> still
> no luck. Here's the output to ls -l :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] control]# ls -l *.pem
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 33 Apr 6 22:26 clientcert.pem ->
>
Hi Bill,
I tried to chmod all pem files to 777 just to check on the permissions but still
no luck. Here's the output to ls -l :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] control]# ls -l *.pem
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 33 Apr 6 22:26 clientcert.pem ->
/var/qmail/control/servercert.pem*
-rwxrwxrwx1 vpop
Neil wrote:
Hi All,
I've got 2 toaster servers one with the new netqmail-toaster and the other with
the former qmail-toaster. When sending emails from the old toaster machine to
the new netqmail-toaster i get this error on my log:
TLS_connection_to_207.xxx.xxx.xxx_died:_error::lib(0):func
PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:04 AM
Subject: RE: [toaster] TLS
> The cert that we use is an actual valid cert issued by Verisign. Not a
> self signed cert. I just tried the make cert and it appears to have
> sent out correctly this time.
MAybe the cert Expired?
-John
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Abshagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'John Johnson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:04 AM
Subject: RE: [toaster] TLS
> The
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [toaster] TLS
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 11:04 AM, Andy Abshagen wrote:
> The cert that we use is an actual valid cert issued by Verisign. Not
> a self signed cert. I just tried the make cert and it appears to have
> sent out correctly this time. I
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 11:04 AM, Andy Abshagen wrote:
The cert that we use is an actual valid cert issued by Verisign. Not a
self signed cert. I just tried the make cert and it appears to have
sent out correctly this time. I guess the question comes down to
should
a real cert be abl
-Original Message-
From: John Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 1:51 PM
To: Andy Abshagen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [toaster] TLS
Ok, This is strange.. Have you tried to make a new cert?
-John
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Abs
Ok, This is strange.. Have you tried to make a new cert?
-John
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Abshagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:47 AM
Subject: RE: [toaster] TLS
> I've already been down that ro
ECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 1:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [toaster] TLS
IS the file a symlink?
-John
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Abshagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003
IS the file a symlink?
-John
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Abshagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:28 AM
Subject: [toaster] TLS
> We have several boxes that we have used the Toaster on for some time.
> Starting today we have been rec
been fixed on the other one and
I just didn't recall... Who knows that CRS kicks in sometimes
And I forget :)
-John
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 8:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 08:53 PM, John Johnson wrote:
I fixed my own tls problems... I deleted the linked client amd
Coped the servercert.pem to clientcert.pem and did a chown qmaild.qmail
On clientcert.pem and it all works.. Thanks Bill
That's what I was going to recommend.. ;) Earl
On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 05:11 PM, John Johnson wrote:
ok, can someone please help me.. This is the only Server I have
Had this problem with and I wanted to make sure it's not me that
Has the error...It's giving me a
TLS_found_no_client_cert_in_control/clientcert.pem error
See section o
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 11:54 AM, Nicholas Chua wrote:
In the early posts, i had some problem running the STARTTLS on my
mailserver and some mailservers wont be able to deliver the mails to
my mailserver. Losing quite a number of mails from a few hosts.
Finally decided to remove/disa
32 matches
Mail list logo
