Re: [toaster] SquirrelMail is very slow

2004-06-01 Thread Bill Shupp
Jeff Koch wrote: Hi Bill: Thanks for responding. The optimizer is a good suggestion which should help. But maybe I didn't make myself clear. SquirrelMail runs just fine and is snappy from WITHIN our network but is very slow only when using a browser from OUTSIDE of our network. It is running on a v

Re: [toaster] SquirrelMail is very slow

2004-06-01 Thread Eero Volotinen
Jeff Koch wrote: Hi Bill: Thanks for responding. The optimizer is a good suggestion which should help. But maybe I didn't make myself clear. SquirrelMail runs just fine and is snappy from WITHIN our network but is very slow only when using a browser from OUTSIDE of our network. It is running on a v

RE: [toaster] SquirrelMail is very slow

2004-06-01 Thread Jeff Koch
browser and squirrelmail before a page is loaded or refreshed. -Original Message- From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 10:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [toaster] SquirrelMail is very slow Jeff Koch wrote: > > Hi All: > > We

Re: [toaster] SquirrelMail is very slow

2004-06-01 Thread Eero Volotinen
Jeff Koch wrote: Squirrelmail seems to be generating fairly lite-weight web pages so we are at a loss to understand why it runs so slow from outside our What are other people seeing? or should we just switch to SqWebMail? Try to use dovecot imapd instead of courier. It is faster. -- Eero

Re: [toaster] SquirrelMail is very slow

2004-05-31 Thread Bill Shupp
Jeff Koch wrote: Hi All: We have the standard toaster setup with courier-imap and squirrelmail. We are finding that although squirrelmail has acceptable performance from web browsers within our network it is agonizingly slow when accessed outside of our network - even from high speed connections