Re: [toaster] Qmail Pre filter

2004-11-30 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
Bill Shupp wrote: True. The only advantage of SMTP is that it would be software independent. So people could use the plugin for more than Exchange, or whatever LDAP based MTA they use. I didn't think of it from that perspective.. :) Although, I'd personally ditch the exchange box.. *grin* (n

Re: [toaster] Qmail Pre filter

2004-11-29 Thread Bill Shupp
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote: Bill Shupp wrote: I'm not aware of anything that does this. There would need to be a mechanism to find out if a user/forward/list exists on the Exchange server. I suppose you could write a plugin for qmail-spp that makes an smtp connection to the actual excha

Re: [toaster] Qmail Pre filter

2004-11-29 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
Bill Shupp wrote: I'm not aware of anything that does this. There would need to be a mechanism to find out if a user/forward/list exists on the Exchange server. I suppose you could write a plugin for qmail-spp that makes an smtp connection to the actual exchange server and check if the recip

RE: [toaster] Qmail Pre filter

2004-11-29 Thread Neil
-Original Message- From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 3:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [toaster] Qmail Pre filter Neil wrote: >Hi, > >Does anybody have good ideas on implementing a qmail filter to pass on >emails to an exc

Re: [toaster] Qmail Pre filter

2004-11-29 Thread Bill Shupp
Neil wrote: Hi, Does anybody have good ideas on implementing a qmail filter to pass on emails to an exchange server? I've read a couple of em thru google search but none I have seen that would prevent dictionary attacks on the qmail server. Is there a way I could have chkusr work with smtproutes fo