Re: [toaster] new qmail patch

2003-02-08 Thread John Johnson
- Original Message - From: "Bill Shupp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:38 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] new qmail patch > On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 04:36 PM, John Johnson wrote: > > Excellent,

Re: [toaster] new qmail patch

2003-02-08 Thread Bill Shupp
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 04:36 PM, John Johnson wrote: ok, well it's on 2 production mail servers This mail server I am using now is one of them and no problems at the moment.. anything you want me to do other than just let it run let me know. Excellent, thanks for testing. I'm

Re: [toaster] new qmail patch

2003-02-08 Thread John Johnson
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] new qmail patch > On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 04:25 PM, John Johnson wrote: > > > I take it to turn it off you replace the 1 with a 0 > > Actually, you need to remove the file. The 1 might not be necessary > either. > > Bill > >

Re: [toaster] new qmail patch

2003-02-08 Thread John Johnson
- Original Message - From: "Bill Shupp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:32 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] new qmail patch > > shared libraries: libc.so.6: failed to map segment from shared object: > > Cannot a

Re: [toaster] new qmail patch

2003-02-08 Thread Bill Shupp
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 04:25 PM, John Johnson wrote: I take it to turn it off you replace the 1 with a 0 Actually, you need to remove the file. The 1 might not be necessary either. Bill

Re: [toaster] new qmail patch

2003-02-08 Thread Bill Shupp
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 03:57 PM, John Johnson wrote: ok, I have a problem with this patch on anther server I updated... Thank god for backups.. This is the error I get in the smtp log, does this mean I have to give softlimit more memory for qmail? @40003e45945b184ec934 /var/qm

Re: [toaster] new qmail patch

2003-02-08 Thread John Johnson
I take it to turn it off you replace the 1 with a 0 -John - Original Message - From: "Bill Shupp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 2:53 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] new qmail patch > On Saturday, February 8, 2003, a

Re: [toaster] new qmail patch

2003-02-08 Thread John Johnson
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 2:53 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] new qmail patch > On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 01:20 PM, John Johnson wrote: > > > mfcheck patch site is down.. is there anything I need to know about > > thi

Re: [toaster] new qmail patch

2003-02-08 Thread John Johnson
more goodies :) -John - Original Message - From: "Bill Shupp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 2:53 PM Subject: Re: [toaster] new qmail patch > On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 01:20 PM, John Johnson wrote: > > &g

Re: [toaster] new qmail patch

2003-02-08 Thread Bill Shupp
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 01:20 PM, John Johnson wrote: mfcheck patch site is down.. is there anything I need to know about this one? can and how to turn it on and off and such.. qmail compiled just fine with the new patch but I am afraid to do a make setup check with out knowing. mfc

Re: [toaster] new qmail patch

2003-02-07 Thread John Johnson
This is what I have been waiting for.. You are the man -John - Original Message - From: "Bill Shupp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:48 PM Subject: [toaster] new qmail patch > All, > > I have put toget

[toaster] new qmail patch

2003-02-07 Thread Bill Shupp
All, I have put together a new Large Qmail patch for the upcoming 0.5 version of the toaster. If you have time, please help test it: http://shupp.org/patches/qmail-toaster-0.50.patch.gz This one has more patches.. 9 in all: big-concurrency (allow concurrencies above 255) TLS Maildir++ SMTP-AU