using recordio in the qmail-smtpd/run file startup script as well.
cheers
Shane
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, 26 July 2004 9:47 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [toaster] chkuser patch - logging
>
>
>Hi Shane:
ne
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, 26 July 2004 9:14 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [toaster] chkuser patch - logging
>
>Hi David:
>
>Thanks but is there something I need to turn on. We have the
>chkuser patc
I didn't realize before. Yes, probably I have that information because
I'm using recordio inside the qmail-smtpd run script.
Here's an excerpt of qmail-smtpd run:
/usr/bin/recordio /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -b -r sbl.spamhaus.org -r
relays.ordb.org \
/usr/bin/relay-ctrl-check /var/qmail/bin/qmail
\
'-* * > *' '-* * < *' '+* * < HELO *' '+* * < MAIL *' '+* * < RCPT *' '+* *
> 5*' '+* * > 4*' /var/log/qmail/smtpd
Regards
Shane
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Hi David:
Thanks but is there something I need to turn on. We have the chkuser patch
working on three mailservers ( I know because of the rejection replies to
test messages) but there are no entries in the /var/log/qmail/smtpd logs.
At 02:49 AM 7/26/2004, you wrote:
Yes, you will find in the smt
Yes, you will find in the smtpd log file lines like this:
550 sorry, no mailbox here by that name (#5.1.1 - chkusr)
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 07:04, Jeff Koch wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Does anyone know if there is any logging of connections rejected by the
> chkuser patch?
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Jeff Ko
Hi:
Does anyone know if there is any logging of connections rejected by the
chkuser patch?
Best Regards,
Jeff Koch, Intersessions
Lars E. D. Jensen wrote:
If you have a catch all then the chkusr patch will pass all mail to the
domain as its going to a valid mailbox. You will need to use
bounce-no-mailbox to reject the mail.
Shane
Ahhh, thanks Shane :)
You can still use the chkusr patch with the catchall account.
Edit in th
If you have a catch all then the chkusr patch will pass all mail to the
domain as its going to a valid mailbox. You will need to use
bounce-no-mailbox to reject the mail.
Shane
Ahhh, thanks Shane :)
--
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Lars E. D. Jensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Hi all
>
>I've compiled and build a debian deb package with the Qmail chkuser
>patch mysql version and Large Qmail Patch for Netqmail.
>
>The chkuser patch works in my local environment with the deb package
>installed together with vpopmail, but when I try to install it on
>another server it se
Hi all
I've compiled and build a debian deb package with the Qmail chkuser
patch mysql version and Large Qmail Patch for Netqmail.
The chkuser patch works in my local environment with the deb package
installed together with vpopmail, but when I try to install it on
another server it seems that
Is it support to reject unknow user like chkuser patch?
- Original Message -
From: "Jeronimo Zucco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [toaster] chkuser patch ldap
Use qmail-ldap:
http://www.nrg4u.com
--
Use qmail-ldap:
http://www.nrg4u.com
--
Jeronimo Zucco
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key: www.riscozero.inf.br/pgp/jczucco.pgp
---
Risco Zero - Suporte, Conectividade e Segurança da Informação Ltda.
Av. Julio de Castilhos, 81
Hi,
Is there any
chkuser patch for ldap backend of vpopmail
?Regards,Jimmy.
On Nov 3, 2003, at 6:22 PM, John Johnson wrote:
This is from the website the patch came from.. I am not shure how I
would
add this to make the chkuser patch work
any help please ?
You need to add those lines to qmail-smtpd.c, but not the "+" signs at
the begging. I put together a new chkuser p
This is from the website the patch came from.. I am not shure how I would
add this to make the chkuser patch work
any help please ?
-John
TMDA
TMDA needs the straight check of user existance to be widened, allowing any
address like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" to be considered v
Doh!
It's always something obvious... *sigh* And here I was looking through
code, trying to figure it all out... *groan*
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 16:35, Bill Shupp wrote:
> On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 12:10 PM, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to get the
On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 12:10 PM, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to get the chkuser patch installed on my qmail system.
Currently installed are the following :
qmail-1.03 (with the 0.5 toaster patch) (ucspi-tcp and daemontools too)
vpopmail 5.3.20 (compiled
Hi all,
I'm trying to get the chkuser patch installed on my qmail system.
Currently installed are the following :
qmail-1.03 (with the 0.5 toaster patch) (ucspi-tcp and daemontools too)
vpopmail 5.3.20 (compiled with --enable-roaming-users=y
--enable-logging=y --enable-default-domain=em
Hi All,
I have a working toaster-qmail server :-)
I want to try chkuser patch but I could not.
1- I patched qmail src with "patch -p0 < ../tar/chkuser.patch"
2- and give make command in the "/var/src/qmail-1.03"
3- I received
***
[EMAIL PROTECTED] qmail-1.03]# make
./compile qmail-s
> > Does this patch fix up the TLS error which i previously encounter?
>
> It should. I have not seen the error since applying the 0.5 patch a
> few weeks ago. While I never pinpointed the cause of the problem, this
> version uses the SMTP-AUTH/TLS integration patch on qmail.org, rather
> than m
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 07:37 PM, Nicholas Chua wrote:
FYI: I've posted a version of the vpopmail chkuser patch that applies
to qmail on top of my new 0.5 toaster patch. Both are available on
www.shupp.org.
Does this patch fix up the TLS error which i previously encounter?
It should. I h
> FYI: I've posted a version of the vpopmail chkuser patch that applies
> to qmail on top of my new 0.5 toaster patch. Both are available on
> www.shupp.org.
Does this patch fix up the TLS error which i previously encounter?
FYI: I've posted a version of the vpopmail chkuser patch that applies
to qmail on top of my new 0.5 toaster patch. Both are available on
www.shupp.org.
For those of you unfamiliar with the chkuser patch, it adds support to
qmail-smtpd for checking that a vpopmail user actually exists before
24 matches
Mail list logo
