Darrell,
Honestly I am not sure how you would go about sending e-mails through
your scanning machine.Hopefully someone else from the list will
respond with the answer.
Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter,
thanks for getting back to me so quickly. I may need to reroute outgoin
Peter,
thanks for getting back to me so quickly. I may need to reroute outgoing
AOL mail thru the gateway email server. I attempted this yesterday by
creating an smtproutes file and adding "aol.com:my.gtw.ip.addr" . The
gateway sent me a message back telling me that:
Remote host said: 553 sorry,
Darrell,
I wasn't that specific in my original post, and for that I apologize.
Our setup is configured like I mentioned, except for the fact that our
primary mail server(the one with the vpopmail accounts) is configured
as a backup MX in our DNS zones. This way if our primary scanner goes
On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 23:54, Bill Shupp wrote:
> No. The chkuser patch needs access to the .qmail-default file to
> determine whether a catchall is in use. It also requires access to to
> .qmail files to check for aliases/forwards, as well as mailing lists.
Hrm... So using NFS is the "accept
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
If you set up the toaster as per Bill's instructions, and you're using
MySQL with vpopmail, won't the checkuser patch still work?
No. The chkuser patch needs access to the .qmail-default file to
determine whether a catchall is in use. It also requires access to
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 17:46, Peter Maag wrote:
> Jeff,
> Yes, as Bill pointed out we do loose the benefit of the checkuser patch,
> but many of our users use catch-all accounts. So, in that respect there
> really was no downside in not going with the chkuser patch(unless I am
> mistaken, an
Has anyone ever tried this - is it a reliable solution? do the servers bog
down waiting for NFS repsonses?
At 06:04 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
Tom Collins wrote:
On Feb 27, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Bill Shupp wrote:
The one thing that you can lose by doing this is chkuser support. Two
workarounds are t
We thought about using valias support but even with that mailinglists and
autoresponders addresses would be missed. NFS mounting of /home/vpopmail
always seems a little risky to us. We're going to try mirroring via rsync
just the top couple of levels of the /home/vpopmail/domains directories so
Tom Collins wrote:
On Feb 27, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Bill Shupp wrote:
The one thing that you can lose by doing this is chkuser support. Two
workarounds are to use MySQL w/ valias support, or perhaps share the
mail spool via NFS.
Mailing lists aren't stored in MySQL, even with valias support turne
Jeff,
Yes, as Bill pointed out we do loose the benefit of the checkuser patch,
but many of our users use catch-all accounts. So, in that respect there
really was no downside in not going with the chkuser patch(unless I am
mistaken, and it works with catchalls).
Peter
Jeff Koch wrote:
H
Hi Peter:
I was thinking of that also. But didn't you lose the benefit of 'checkuser'
patch. We have one domain that used to have a catch-all and now gets 40,000
spams a day addressed to every possible name. We shut down the catch-all
and the checkuser patch rejects them all saving us all kind
On Feb 27, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Bill Shupp wrote:
The one thing that you can lose by doing this is chkuser support. Two
workarounds are to use MySQL w/ valias support, or perhaps share the
mail spool via NFS.
Mailing lists aren't stored in MySQL, even with valias support turned
on. I have ideas o
Peter Maag wrote:
Jeff,
We had a similar problem, and our bottleneck was SpamAssassin and Clam
Scanner. We ended up putting SpamAssassin and Clamd on a seperate
machine that simply scanned the incoming messages and passed them onto
the primary mail machine that housed the vpopmail accounts,
Jeff,
We had a similar problem, and our bottleneck was SpamAssassin and Clam
Scanner. We ended up putting SpamAssassin and Clamd on a seperate
machine that simply scanned the incoming messages and passed them onto
the primary mail machine that housed the vpopmail accounts, etc.
All you need
Hi Bill:
Thanks for the reply.
I know how to run mysql from another server but how would one move spamd
and clamd to another server? Your other suggestions are good but we're
using a 1U rack server that unfortunately has room for one drive (big
mistake!).
At 02:44 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
Jef
Jeff Koch wrote:
Does anybody have any suggestion for improving the performance of a
mailserver runnning
qmail/vpopmail/qmailadmin/qmail-scanner/spamassassin? We're using a
2.4Ghz P4 with 1GB RAM and a 40GB SCSI drive. The operating system is a
basic RH8.0 install with the ext3 journalling fil
Does anybody have any suggestion for improving the performance of a
mailserver runnning qmail/vpopmail/qmailadmin/qmail-scanner/spamassassin?
We're using a 2.4Ghz P4 with 1GB RAM and a 40GB SCSI drive. The operating
system is a basic RH8.0 install with the ext3 journalling file system.
We're ha
17 matches
Mail list logo
