Re: [toaster] RFC 2821 patch

2005-08-17 Thread Christian Lyra
Hi, > >Recently, my toaster (err.. the mail one) is having problem to > > delivery mail to a given site. Trying to debug the problem, I > > found that this site advertises 3 MXs, one is dead, the other one > > always reply with 550 after the DATA estage, and one works. > > Sometimes my qm

Re: [toaster] RFC 2821 patch

2005-08-17 Thread Bill Shupp
Christian Lyra wrote: Hi, Recently, my toaster (err.. the mail one) is having problem to delivery mail to a given site. Trying to debug the problem, I found that this site advertises 3 MXs, one is dead, the other one always reply with 550 after the DATA estage, and one works. Sometimes my qm

Re: [toaster] RFC 2821 patch

2005-08-17 Thread Shane Chrisp
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 11:01 +0200, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > Hello Christian, > > Tuesday, August 16, 2005, 10:44:30 PM, you wrote: > > [1] http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail-bugs.html (section > > 3.2) > About the whole file: Man, this is scary. It puts me off. > I new qmail has pr

Re: [toaster] RFC 2821 patch

2005-08-17 Thread Maciej Soltysiak
Hello Christian, Tuesday, August 16, 2005, 10:44:30 PM, you wrote: > [1] http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail-bugs.html (section > 3.2) About the whole file: Man, this is scary. It puts me off. I new qmail has problems but this many? One day I guess I will start considering using exi

[toaster] RFC 2821 patch

2005-08-16 Thread Christian Lyra
Hi, Recently, my toaster (err.. the mail one) is having problem to delivery mail to a given site. Trying to debug the problem, I found that this site advertises 3 MXs, one is dead, the other one always reply with 550 after the DATA estage, and one works. Sometimes my qmail works right