Re: [toaster] Anyone using simscan + spamc

2008-09-30 Thread Jason S
Shane Chrisp wrote: On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 23:49 +0800, Shane Chrisp wrote: That will happen if the email is addressed to more than one person. Other than that, if it's only addressed to one person, simscan should pass the user name correctly. I might have to try an older version of simscan the

Re: [toaster] Anyone using simscan + spamc

2008-09-29 Thread Jason S
Shane Chrisp wrote: On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 12:16 -0400, Jason S wrote: right. If you enable spam-hits, then passthru is disabled. --enable-spam-passthru=y|n This option turns spam passthru on and off. When enabled, email identified as spam via the X-Spam-Status: header will be passed

Re: [toaster] Anyone using simscan + spamc

2008-09-29 Thread Jason S
Rick Macdougall wrote: Jason S wrote: I've used --enable-spam-passthru on 1.1 and currently on 1.4. Yup, I can enable it as well but then it passes all spam through, which is not what I thought it was intended to do since I want to reject spam greater than X points (in our case X

Re: [toaster] Anyone using simscan + spamc

2008-09-29 Thread Jason S
Rick Macdougall wrote: Jason S wrote: Rick Macdougall wrote: Make sure to use this configure option if you don't want all spam to be rejected at the smtp level (for delivery to spam folder, etc). --enable-spam-passthru=y Nope, that doesn't work correctly with simscan 1.2

Re: [toaster] Anyone using simscan + spamc

2008-09-29 Thread Jason S
Rick Macdougall wrote: Shane Chrisp wrote: Hi, Is anyone running simscan + spamc with user prefs stored in sql or even in file at all? I have been looking at it and it doesnt look like its that difficult to set up but maybe im missing something. Any input would be appreciated. Shane Yup, w

Re: [toaster] Anyone using simscan + spamc

2008-09-29 Thread Jason S
Shane Chrisp wrote: Hi, Is anyone running simscan + spamc with user prefs stored in sql or even in file at all? I have been looking at it and it doesnt look like its that difficult to set up but maybe im missing something. Any input would be appreciated. Shane are you referring to spamassas

Re: [toaster] vpopmail domain creation

2007-06-08 Thread Jason S
Bob Hutchinson wrote: If I create a domain in vpopmail using vadddomain, any mail destined for that domain sent by anyone else on that box will be delivered there, irrespective of MX settings. What I would *like* to do is pre-create a domain so that a customer can set up things in qmailadmin

Re: [toaster] spam throttle

2007-03-21 Thread Jason S
Bill Shupp wrote: Is anyone using feature successfully? If so, how have you dealt with the lack of garbage collection? (The directories/files it creates can fill up all available inodes on a system). I'm asking because I'm considering removing it from the toaster patch, I don't use it anymore.

Re: [toaster] Stopping Dictionary Attacks

2005-10-13 Thread Jason S
On 10/13/05, Jeff Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After getting hit with a number of dictionary attacks on our websites andexperienced the server load and queue jump to extraordinary levels wedecided to do a little testing to find out how chk_user works and the best setting for the vpopmail catch-a

Re: [toaster] SMTP-AUTH not working...

2005-09-25 Thread Jason S
On 9/25/05, Jason (AMD_) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good Evening Bill, > Still having my smtp auth problem here :( I just got done doing a > complete reinstall of vpopmail and qmail using your guide and it still > won't work. The weird thing is that I am getting this error when > tryingto d

Re: [toaster] Issues with qmailmrtg7 statistics

2005-09-22 Thread Jason S
On 9/21/05, Bob Hutchinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 21 Sep 2005 18:29, Sloath wrote:> Hi all,>> I have a system set-up according to the guide, with qmail logging using> multilog to /var/log/qmail and using qmailmrtg7 for creating graphs. >> I've been investigating a few peaks in my m

Re: [toaster] SPF reject

2005-09-01 Thread Jason S
On 9/1/05, Carlos Cesario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello all,   I have qmail server with shupp patches and I'm reading about SPF +qmail and I have one doubt.   Does is possible to reject spf fail and spf failsoft ? Or only spffail or spf failsoft ?  (options 3 and 4). greatsCarlos-BEGIN PGP S

Re: [toaster] FW: Cram-md5 doesn't work

2005-06-09 Thread Jason S
On 6/9/05, Marco Cordeiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi All , I just deploy this toaster in a Centos4 box and everything it's > work fine > But when I try to use SMTP Auth with CRAM-MD5 (pegasus MTU) the system > Give error ??? > > In time SMTP auth plain (outlook) is working fine

Re: [toaster] EZMLM Cannot work in NFS

2005-05-23 Thread Jason S
On 5/23/05, Bill WONG-SV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dear Jason, > could you let me know what's yr settings? as i got FreeBSD > as NFS and client, and the EZMLM cannot work properly, the moderator cannot > work and it seems the EZMLM's process being locked. > --- here for y

Re: [toaster] using mrtg with the toaster

2005-05-23 Thread Jason S
On 5/23/05, Rene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason S schrieb: > > >On 5/23/05, Rene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>hi list, > >> > >>I try to implement the qmailmrtg7 from inter7 into the toaster > >>(http://www.in

Re: [toaster] using mrtg with the toaster

2005-05-23 Thread Jason S
On 5/23/05, Rene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi list, > > I try to implement the qmailmrtg7 from inter7 into the toaster > (http://www.inter7.com/qmailmrtg7) > But i get no output from clamd and spamassassin. > i updated the path ind cfg but maybe it didn't work because they are > running with mu

Re: [toaster] EZMLM Cannot work in NFS

2005-05-23 Thread Jason S
On 5/22/05, Bill WONG - SV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dear All, > I have installed the toaster in a NFS Server, however, i found > that the EZMLM cannot work. could anyone got any idea on this issue? Thx. > > > Bill It works for me over NFS. What specific problems are y

Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd log question

2005-04-20 Thread Jason S
On 4/20/05, Dan Scrimpsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am trying to figure out something with the qmail-smtpd log file. > Right now when the /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current log file reaches 96K it > rolls to a new current file and gives the old current file a name like > '@400042669d580ae6

Re: Re[3]: [toaster] sending spam to users' spam folders

2005-04-13 Thread Jason S
On 4/13/05, Maciej Soltysiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Maciej, > > Wednesday, April 13, 2005, 4:06:33 PM, you wrote: > > > Hi Jason, > > > I will try that, thanks! > > >> If you use qmailadmin, then use the --enable-modify-spam and the > >> --enable-spam-command to allow the option of

Re: [toaster] About auth user log

2005-04-13 Thread Jason S
On 4/13/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Where I can see the log for users that has been authenticated? > > Maybe I need to turn on something on qmail-smtp run file or in vpopmail, no? > > Thanks, > -- > Walter. > > If you're talking about POP3 logins, then try /var/

Re: [toaster] sending spam to users' spam folders

2005-04-13 Thread Jason S
On 4/13/05, Maciej Sołtysiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have a qmail setup done according to the toaster. > (vpopmail+mysql, courier) > However I am using qmail-scanner. > > I would like to have mail classified as spam by > qmail-scanner-queue to be sent to users .spam folders. >

Re: [toaster] Mailing List

2005-04-05 Thread Jason S
On Apr 5, 2005 9:38 AM, YM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Did anyone try the Mailing List in QMailAdmin? It uses the ezmlm for the > purpose. > > I created a mailing list with the option - only moderator can post, all other > bounced. But the funny thing is that it still sends out confirmat

[toaster] Re: toaster Digest of: get.2963

2005-03-08 Thread Jason S
> From: "Jeffrey Holste" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:32:58 -0700 > Subject: SIMScan and Spam Passthru > > Used the toaster to setup a Debian based server. It is working well EXCEPT > any piece of email flagged as Spam is not getting passed thru. Good email > gets X-S