Re: [toaster] smtproutes and chkuser

Charles Chambers wrote: Bill Shupp wrote: John Melville wrote: Bill Shupp wrote: I run backup MX for some clients, and mail goes through just fine. I have not examined the patch closely in a while, but it appears that if vpopmail does not have a listing for the domain, chkuser does not fail

Re: [toaster] smtproutes and chkuser

Bill Shupp wrote: John Melville wrote: Bill Shupp wrote: I run backup MX for some clients, and mail goes through just fine. I have not examined the patch closely in a while, but it appears that if vpopmail does not have a listing for the domain, chkuser does not fail. I can confirm this, I run

[toaster] Success on Whitebox

Went well on Whitebox Linux (3.0-Fixed) test server in VMWare. http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/ Thanks Bill! Charles

Re: [toaster] strange stuff in log.

I found this thread: http://www.ornl.gov/lists/mailing-lists/qmail/1998/12/msg00840.html On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 22:26, John Johnson wrote: > Can anyone shed some light on this? It's in my qmail log file and the > server is having mail problems but that's because we found the DNS > server > was n

[toaster] Could I be open or just unlucky?

osted domain is astrolabeanalytica.com Are the spammers just using my domain as the return address, and today was "my turn"? Also are there any steps I can take to prevent this (I doubt it but thought I'd ask)? Does it appear as if I'm open? Thanks for your att