On Nov 1, 2007, at 4:50 PM, Bill Shupp wrote:
What does this patch do that chkuser doesn't already do?
One big thing that I like is that it can have custom reject messages
for each address. So, if I have to kill an address that's
overwhelmed with spam, I can have a custom reject like "that
There are lots of options in the chkuser patch. Check the website for
further info. http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/
Thanks Shane and Bill.
I didn't even know that chkuser can do all this. This happens when a clue
less web dev does the system administration ;)
Before I used Bill
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 12:28 +0100, Sasa Ebach wrote:
> > ...
> > 250 snoopy.2000cn.com.au
> > mail from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 250 ok
> > rcpt to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 511 sorry, no mailbox here by that name (#5.1.1 - chkuser)
>
> Oh, I didn't realize that I could configure that. I will try t
...
250 snoopy.2000cn.com.au
mail from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250 ok
rcpt to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
511 sorry, no mailbox here by that name (#5.1.1 - chkuser)
Oh, I didn't realize that I could configure that. I will try to find out
more about that.
But still, does it have the configurable threshh
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 11:45 +0100, Sasa Ebach wrote:
> >> [1] http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/validrcptto.cdb.shtml
> >> [2] http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/netqmail-1.05-validrcptto.cdb.2.patch
> >
> > What does this patch do that chkuser doesn't already do?
>
> It stops delivery of non existant adr
[1] http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/validrcptto.cdb.shtml
[2] http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/netqmail-1.05-validrcptto.cdb.2.patch
What does this patch do that chkuser doesn't already do?
It stops delivery of non existant adresses at the earliest possible point.
Here is what my server does:
#
Hello,
from patch file:
+# This table is not used yet, possibly never will be
+create table mail_log# Stores a record for every mail delivery attempt
grep dns_name *
dbdef.sql:create table dns_name# Stores the reverse dns name
lookup for records
grep mail_log *
dbdef.sql:create t
Hi,
thanks to Lampa it seems greylisting patch is doing something now.
But after one day of patch being "working" I have about 30 records in db
table relaytofrom
with for example "blocked_count=28, passed_count=30"
I am ok with this. But ... there is NO record in dns_name and NO record
in maillo
