Re: [toaster] Rejecting invalid mail addresses at the RCPT TO stage

2006-04-03 Thread Bob Hutchinson
On Monday 03 Apr 2006 18:52, Nikki Locke wrote: > Is there an easy way of getting qmail's SMTP server to reject invalid > > addresses at the RCPT TO stage? That's what the chkuser patch does. (At least that's what I think you mean) have a look at chkuser_settings.h in the patched source tree, ther

Re: [toaster] Rejecting invalid mail addresses at the RCPT TO stage

2006-04-03 Thread Bill Shupp
Nikki Locke wrote: > Is there an easy way of getting qmail's SMTP server to reject invalid > > addresses at the RCPT TO stage? > > > It would save a lot of disk space and processing power when I'm hit with > thousands of spams a day. This is already setup by default with my toaster patch. It

Re: [toaster] Just installed the toaster, got a suggestion which may improve it

2006-04-03 Thread Bill Shupp
Nikki Locke wrote: > Just a note for Bill... > > In my CentOS 4 default configuration, when you attempt to copy or move a > file over one that already exists, the O/S asks you if it is OK for each > file. This makes some of the instructions tedious (e.g. "mv ezmlm-idx- > 0.443/* ezmlm-0.53/"), a

[toaster] Rejecting invalid mail addresses at the RCPT TO stage

2006-04-03 Thread Nikki Locke
Is there an easy way of getting qmail's SMTP server to reject invalid addresses at the RCPT TO stage? It would save a lot of disk space and processing power when I'm hit with thousands of spams a day. -- Nikki Locke, Trumphurst Ltd. PC & Unix consultancy & programming http://www.trump

[toaster] Just installed the toaster, got a suggestion which may improve it

2006-04-03 Thread Nikki Locke
Just a note for Bill... In my CentOS 4 default configuration, when you attempt to copy or move a file over one that already exists, the O/S asks you if it is OK for each file. This makes some of the instructions tedious (e.g. "mv ezmlm-idx- 0.443/* ezmlm-0.53/"), and means you had better not jus