Re: [toaster] dictionary attacks

2005-09-14 Thread Alex Sysoef
tonix (Antonio Nati) said: > Sorry for previous mistyping. > > This is not a chkuser question. > If all is setup correctly, chkuser will not do any action if domain > has catchall enabled, so email will be delivered to catchall account. Thanks! --- ... the only eas

Re: [toaster] dictionary attacks

2005-09-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Sorry for previous mistyping. This is not a chkuser question. If all is setup correctly, chkuser will not do any action if domain has catchall enabled, so email will be delivered to catchall account. Tonino At 19.14 14/09/2005, you wrote: This is not a chkuser question. If all il setup corr

Re: [toaster] dictionary attacks

2005-09-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
This is not a chkuser question. If all il setup correctly, chkuser will not do any action is domain has catchall enabled, so email will be delivered to catchall account. Tonino At 17.10 14/09/2005, you wrote: Perhaps this should be a separate question but since its related to chkusr I though

Re: [toaster] dictionary attacks

2005-09-14 Thread Alex Sysoef
Perhaps this should be a separate question but since its related to chkusr I though I would ask: If I set Catch All Bounce on my domain what happens if: 1. Account doesn't exist but forward is for that e-mail address and it point to valid e-mail. 2. If mail robot setup for let's say [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [toaster] dictionary attacks

2005-09-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 16.36 14/09/2005, you wrote: On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 08:25 -0700, Tom Collins wrote: > On Sep 14, 2005, at 8:04 AM, Jeff Koch wrote: > > I think what I am really asking is what is the mechanism for the way > > 'catch-all delete' works versus 'catch-all bounce' so I can determine > > which will h

Re: [toaster] dictionary attacks

2005-09-14 Thread Shane Chrisp
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 08:25 -0700, Tom Collins wrote: > On Sep 14, 2005, at 8:04 AM, Jeff Koch wrote: > > I think what I am really asking is what is the mechanism for the way > > 'catch-all delete' works versus 'catch-all bounce' so I can determine > > which will have a lower load on the server.

Re: [toaster] dictionary attacks

2005-09-14 Thread Shane Chrisp
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 11:04 -0400, Jeff Koch wrote: > Thanks Shawn. > > I think what I am really asking is what is the mechanism for the way > 'catch-all delete' works versus 'catch-all bounce' so I can determine which > will have a lower load on the server. As far as cpu/io load I would sugges

Re: [toaster] dictionary attacks

2005-09-14 Thread Tom Collins
On Sep 14, 2005, at 8:04 AM, Jeff Koch wrote: I think what I am really asking is what is the mechanism for the way 'catch-all delete' works versus 'catch-all bounce' so I can determine which will have a lower load on the server. Since you're using chkusr, I don't think there's a difference. T

Re: [toaster] dictionary attacks

2005-09-14 Thread Jeff Koch
Thanks Shawn. I think what I am really asking is what is the mechanism for the way 'catch-all delete' works versus 'catch-all bounce' so I can determine which will have a lower load on the server. At 11:06 PM 9/13/2005, you wrote: > Hi: > > Our domains are getting hit with large numbers of