Re: [toaster] Forward mail in lan

2005-09-13 Thread qmail
> > On the system they come into, you could add an entry into smtproutes in > the form of > > site1.ezrs.com:[192.168.0.6] > site2.ezrs.com:]192.168.0.8] > > to force the email to the server you want it at. > > cheers > Shane > > Great, thanks a lot. Regards, Qing

Re: [toaster] dictionary attacks

2005-09-13 Thread Shane Chrisp
> Hi: > > Our domains are getting hit with large numbers of spammer dictionary > attacks. We're using the Toaster with chkuser, clamav and spamassassin. > Does anyone know whether it is better to set vpopmail for catch-all delete > or catch-all bounce in handling these attacks. > > It seems to me t

[toaster] dictionary attacks

2005-09-13 Thread Jeff Koch
Hi: Our domains are getting hit with large numbers of spammer dictionary attacks. We're using the Toaster with chkuser, clamav and spamassassin. Does anyone know whether it is better to set vpopmail for catch-all delete or catch-all bounce in handling these attacks. It seems to me that if w

Re: [toaster] Forward mail in lan

2005-09-13 Thread Shane Chrisp
> Dear all, > > I would like to forward incoming message in my local area network. For > example, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---forward---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (192.168.0.6) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---forward---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (192.168.0.8) > > I don't put site1.ezrs.com and site2.ezrs.com in my DNS

[toaster] Forward mail in lan

2005-09-13 Thread qmail
Dear all, I would like to forward incoming message in my local area network. For example, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---forward---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (192.168.0.6) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---forward---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (192.168.0.8) I don't put site1.ezrs.com and site2.ezrs.com in my DNS because I want

Re: [toaster] two questions - clamav/simscan and spamassisan/bayes filters

2005-09-13 Thread Bill Shupp
Hank wrote: First question: Are there any issues or gotchas I might run into while trying to install simscan into an existing toaster set up on a RHEL 3.0 box? Or can I just follow the toaster to install and configure it and go? It's pretty straight ahead. Just read the docs. If something

[toaster] two questions - clamav/simscan and spamassisan/bayes filters

2005-09-13 Thread Hank
First question: I have the standard Shupp toaster installed and running on a production machine, along with maildrop and spamassisan. I'd like to add a virus scanner, and see that I can use clamav or simscan. From the looks of it, simscan looks to be more popular among toaster users. Are there a

Re[2]: [toaster] Sending serveral CC or BBC makes sending slow

2005-09-13 Thread Stig Martin Fiskaa
Hello Tom, TC> Do you have tarpitting enabled? TC> Look for files tarpitcount and tarpitdelay in /var/qmail/control. TC> IIRC, after recipients, qmail-smtpd will delay TC> seconds between each address, and might even increase the TC> delay for every recipient. TC> -- TC> Tom Collins - [EMAI

Re: [toaster] Can't write to sent folder

2005-09-13 Thread Hank
I had just this problem with Outlook Express. I've never used TB, so I have no idea if it applies, but in OE, I had to set the root folder to "INBOX." before it was smart enough to move sent mail to the sent folder. Which was odd, since I could eaily move mail into and out of the sent folder befor

RE: [toaster] Sending serveral CC or BBC makes sending slow

2005-09-13 Thread Ingo Claro
it would be nice to have a list of all control files that the toaster uses. Considering that it has many patches with extra control files. i have knowlege of some. regars, Ingo. -Mensaje original- De: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Martes, 13 de Septiembre d

Re: [toaster] Can't write to sent folder

2005-09-13 Thread Carl Parrish
Hank wrote: What IMAP client are you using? Thunderbird On 9/12/05, Carl Parrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Suddenly in IMAP I can't write to my sent folder. Don't know what permissions have been changed if any. Anyone have any thoughts on what I should check on so I can keep a recode

Re: [toaster] Sending serveral CC or BBC makes sending slow

2005-09-13 Thread Tom Collins
On Sep 13, 2005, at 10:10 AM, Stig Martin Fiskaa wrote: Whenever I or any of my customers sends emails from *any* MUA and the CC-field og BBC-field contains say more then 12 addresses the time to send it out becomes really long - say from 10 or more minutes. Can anyone think of why? Anyth

[toaster] Sending serveral CC or BBC makes sending slow

2005-09-13 Thread Stig Martin Fiskaa
Hello people, Thought I'd ask you if you could direct me to something that either explains or solves my little situation. I've followed the toaster in serveral setups of servers, and I think both it's a great piece of document and a source of knowledge - together with this list. Great!

Re: [toaster] Strange problem with CHKUSR

2005-09-13 Thread Tom Collins
On Sep 13, 2005, at 8:21 AM, Maurice Snellen wrote: Where should I look to find out why CHKUSR is allowing this address when vuserinfo correctly claims the user doesn't exist. I can't find the user in my vpopmail MySQL database either. Is the catchall for the domain set to bounce-no-mailbox or

Re: [toaster] Strange problem with CHKUSR

2005-09-13 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 16.21 13/09/2005, you wrote: Listmembers: I have a domain that is exhibiting really strange behaviour. I recently cleaned out a couple of accounts in this domain, but for some reason CHKUSR insists that the local recipients still exist. Thus spam coming in for these users is still accepted i

[toaster] Strange problem with CHKUSR

2005-09-13 Thread Maurice Snellen
Listmembers: I have a domain that is exhibiting really strange behaviour. I recently cleaned out a couple of accounts in this domain, but for some reason CHKUSR insists that the local recipients still exist. Thus spam coming in for these users is still accepted into the queue and the messages are

Re: [toaster] Can't write to sent folder

2005-09-13 Thread Hank
What IMAP client are you using? On 9/12/05, Carl Parrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Suddenly in IMAP I can't write to my sent folder. Don't know what > permissions have been changed if any. Anyone have any thoughts on what I > should check on so I can keep a recode of my sent messages again? >