Re: [toaster] Noticed that newest toaster does not compile under redhat 7.3

2004-03-31 Thread Rene Marticke
Bill Shupp wrote: I'd be curious to see it. I installed it on RH 7.1 yesterday without problems. I'm pretty sure I have installed it on RH 7.3 as well. Bill I tried it yesterday on redhat 7.2. Same Problem :-( With courrier 3.01 it works fine.

Re: [toaster] Noticed that newest toaster does not compile under redhat 7.3

2004-03-31 Thread Bill Shupp
Eero Volotinen wrote: Bill Shupp wrote: Eero Volotinen wrote: fails on courier-imap compile. That's not enough information. Where does make fail? In midde of make command. Can't provide enought information today, can't access that machine, but maybe tomorrow more, if I remember. I'd be curi

Re: [toaster] Noticed that newest toaster does not compile under redhat 7.3

2004-03-31 Thread Eero Volotinen
Bill Shupp wrote: Eero Volotinen wrote: fails on courier-imap compile. That's not enough information. Where does make fail? In midde of make command. Can't provide enought information today, can't access that machine, but maybe tomorrow more, if I remember. -- Eero

Re: [toaster] Noticed that newest toaster does not compile under redhat 7.3

2004-03-31 Thread Bill Shupp
Eero Volotinen wrote: fails on courier-imap compile. That's not enough information. Where does make fail? Bill

[toaster] Noticed that newest toaster does not compile under redhat 7.3

2004-03-31 Thread Eero Volotinen
fails on courier-imap compile. -- Eero

Re: [toaster] Spamming issue

2004-03-31 Thread Bill Shupp
Andy Abshagen wrote: I'm not sure why it wouldn't work. I'm only wanting to enforce the SMTP-AUTH when it is from and to the same domain. If it is from valid.com and going to test.com it would still go through correctly.. But if it is from test.com and to test.com is when there is a problem.

RE: [toaster] Spamming issue

2004-03-31 Thread Andy Abshagen
> -Original Message- > From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:55 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [toaster] Spamming issue > > Andy Abshagen wrote: > > OK. We are getting sick of this spamming issue. We have a > domain that > > is c

Re: [toaster] Spamming issue

2004-03-31 Thread Bill Shupp
Andy Abshagen wrote: OK. We are getting sick of this spamming issue. We have a domain that is continually being used by spammers to send out mail as being from them and to them. Is there anyway with Qmail/Vpopmail to always require mail from a specific email address or domain to have to use S

[toaster] Spamming issue

2004-03-31 Thread Andy Abshagen
OK.  We are getting sick of this spamming issue.  We have a domain that is continually being used by spammers to send out mail as being from them and to them.  Is there anyway with Qmail/Vpopmail to always require mail from a specific email address or domain to have to use SMTP-auth even if