On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 07:36 AM, Abel Lucano wrote:
Hi all,
we trying to restrict POP3 services to a x.x.x.x-x.x.x.x IP blocks or
predefined Ip's to implement a very specific service.
Is it a tcpserver topic?
Is there anyone who was implemented this?
Should I concentrate myself in
Hi all,
we trying to restrict POP3 services to a x.x.x.x-x.x.x.x IP blocks or
predefined Ip's to implement a very specific service.
Is it a tcpserver topic?
Is there anyone who was implemented this?
Should I concentrate myself in /service/qmail-pop3d/run and
/service/qmail-pop3ds/run scripts?
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Bill Shupp wrote:
> > we trying to restrict POP3 services to a x.x.x.x-x.x.x.x IP blocks or
> > predefined Ip's to implement a very specific service.
> >
>
> Yes, this is a tcpserver topic. See
> http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcprules.html for details on creating your
> rules set
This might not
be the correct list for this but,some mails seems to linger too long in
the local queue.. one cenario =that I have is a mail that was sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with cc to
=[EMAIL PROTECTED] the mail
came thru to [EMAIL PROTECTED] really quick but =the copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED
I have a qmail server set up from the toaster, there isn't all that much mem
in it (384 M) It keeps running out of memory and starts killing processes,
perl processes to be more precise and I believe it's the qmailscanner that's
called does anyone have this problem?
---
Pelle
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 11:33 PM, Pelle Lundström wrote:
I have a qmail server set up from the toaster, there isn't all that
much mem
in it (384 M) It keeps running out of memory and starts killing
processes,
perl processes to be more precise and I believe it's the qmailscanner
that
