Hi all,
If I've done my job well, the commit message should be descriptive
enough. Let me know if you'd like me to make any tweaks.
Have a good week!
Daniel
>From 1e5676ea9420359e7de4ee49339a7d089fab7839 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Ralston
Date: Tue, 16 Apr
Ha!
Yes, that's exactly what you can do. Sorry about that.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Nicholas Marriott
wrote:
> Grouped sessions don't share options so can't you just set
> destroy-unattached for the transient sessions?
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 09
Daniel
>From d7c541ad37dbe14dc50a2878448f5de0b753286c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Ralston
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 01:13:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] FIX window resizing bug when a grouped session's
child dies
When the child of a grouped session dies, and the session's client
switches to the sam
Hi all,
Bug Summary:
When renumber-windows is set, killing a bunch of windows created in another
grouped session will make the server die unexpectedly.
Repro Steps:
- In .tmux.conf: *set -g renumber-windows on*
- Open two terminals.
- In one terminal, run *tmux, *and create a bunch of new window
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 08:10:17PM -0700, Daniel Ralston wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Bug Summary:
> > When renumber-windows is set, killing a bunch of windows created in
> another
> > grouped session w
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 07:08:17AM -0700, Daniel Ralston wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 08:10:17PM -0700, Daniel Ralston wrote:
> > > >
Hi all,
I've found a bug.
Repro steps:
1. Run 'tmux' in a terminal.
2. In another terminal, create a grouped session, by running
'tmux new-session -t '.
3. Resize the second terminal so it is bigger than the first one.
4. Kill the program running in the second (larger) terminal; e.g. b
ry);
> - free(sg);
> + session_destroy(s);
> + }
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/session.c b/session.c
> index 74eb06a..24e2e5e 100644
> --- a/session.c
> +++ b/session.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ void
> session_destroy
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> I appreciate your bug reports, because they're easy for me to reproduce, but
> the next time you submit one, I'd appreciate something like a corefile
> backtrace.
Ah, I had wondered about that. I'll include a core dump with my bug
reports from
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Nicholas Marriott
wrote:
> I don't think it is right to move recalculate_sizes(), we should do
> whatever is needed to make it safe to call it there. Do you have a
> backtrace?
I do indeed, and here it is.
I also have the full core dump compressed down to 2.5 Mb.
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Nicholas Marriott
wrote:
> Does this do it instead?
>
> diff --git a/server-fn.c b/server-fn.c
> index 7ef6413..37ef879 100644
> --- a/server-fn.c
> +++ b/server-fn.c
> @@ -396,9 +396,9 @@ server_destroy_session_group(struct session *s)
> if ((sg = session_
11 matches
Mail list logo
