Re: trouble with control characters

> I'm on a Mac Book Pro, there is no delete key. What about fn-backspace? Stroller. -- Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the

Re: trouble with control characters

* Stroller on Wednesday, February 05, 2014 at 13:56:24 + >> I'm on a Mac Book Pro, there is no delete key. > > What about fn-backspace? Tried that already, does nothing at all under any circumstances. But I'm gonna re-check. -- theatre - books - texts - movies Black Trash Productions at hom

[PATCH 0/3] Update tmux.vim

New options have been added since the last time tmux.vim has been edited. In addition, they've grown into quite a mess. These patches synchronize the keywords with the command and option tables and sort them in alphabetical order to make finding discrepencies easier to find. Command aliases are als

[PATCH 2/3] Sort and organize option names in tmux.vim

Also update with the latest options and remove the to-be-deprecated {-attr,-bg,-fg} options. Signed-off-by: Ben Boeckel --- examples/tmux.vim | 51 +-- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/tmux.vim b/examples/tmu

[PATCH 3/3] Alphabetize options in the option table

Signed-off-by: Ben Boeckel --- options-table.c | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/options-table.c b/options-table.c index 64d3edc..32f4582 100644 --- a/options-table.c +++ b/options-table.c @@ -535,17 +535,17 @@ const struct options_table_entry window

[PATCH 1/3] Sort and organize commands in tmux.vim

Signed-off-by: Ben Boeckel --- examples/tmux.vim | 49 +++-- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/tmux.vim b/examples/tmux.vim index e85f8ff..bff9cd1 100644 --- a/examples/tmux.vim +++ b/examples/tmux.vim @@ -31,32 +3

choose-* and panes

Hi, Currently, all of the choose-* commands take a target window when they really apply to panes. Is it worth making a patch to update the docs and code to have them take panes or is their replacement (at least, ISTR Thomas Adam working on one) close enough to not bother? Thanks, --Ben

Re: choose-* and panes

On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:08:24PM -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote: > Hi, > > Currently, all of the choose-* commands take a target window when they > really apply to panes. Is it worth making a patch to update the docs and > code to have them take panes or is their replacement (at least, ISTR > Thomas A

Re: choose-* and panes

On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 19:10:36 +, Thomas Adam wrote: > It's not worth it, IMO. OK. Thanks. --Ben -- Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common

Re: use "--" to mark start of command w/ neww etc to avoid quoting

> The original behaviour needs to stay if there is 1 arg. Should there be a way to force the new behavior? This might be desirable since quoting would be different in this one case. For example, someone might enter: neww "/path/x y/bin/foo" ...and their intention is to run the command "foo"

Re: use "--" to mark start of command w/ neww etc to avoid quoting

I don't think we need a way to force new behaviour. Doing our own quoting seems unnecessary and error prone esp if someone is using a weird shell. Original message From: J Raynor Date: 06/02/2014 01:00 (GMT+00:00) To: Nicholas Marriott Cc: tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.ne