From: Thomas Adam
Currently, a conditional format only returns the string given based on
whether the condition is true or false. This means the following does not
work:
#{?session_attached,#{session_name},no session}
This change expands the item returned from the conditional if it's a
recog
Thomas writes:
> @@ -182,6 +182,9 @@ format_replace(struct format_tree *ft,
> goto fail;
> value = ptr + 1;
> }
> +
> + if ((value_found = format_expand(ft, value)) != NULL)
> + value = value_found;
Hi
> @@ -232,7 +235,7 @@ format_expand(struct format_tree *ft, const char *fmt)
> ch = (u_char) *fmt++;
> switch (ch) {
> case '{':
> - ptr = strchr(fmt, '}');
> + ptr = strrchr(fmt, '}');
How does this not break mu
On 25 April 2013 22:25, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Hi
>
>> @@ -232,7 +235,7 @@ format_expand(struct format_tree *ft, const char *fmt)
>> ch = (u_char) *fmt++;
>> switch (ch) {
>> case '{':
>> - ptr = strchr(fmt, '}');
>> +
Ok. I think you have the right idea about recursing through
format_expand you are just going to need to pull out the affected format
differently (ditch strchr and use a custom loop which counts {s and }s).
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:25:09PM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Hi
>
> > @@ -232,7 +
Hi
The relevant license/copyright is at the top of every source file, I
don't think we need it in another place. Note that it differs for some
files in compat/ and examples/.
IIRC Debian have a full list of all the licenses in some file in their
package.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:46:56PM +0200
All,
I was wondering if tmux could be used as a collaborative tool
independently. Right now, each attached session gets the same view -
which is great in the case where you want that behavior (sharing a
screen etc) but which is not all that great if you want to have
different users typing on indep
Hi,
On 25 April 2013 23:55, Edward Peschko wrote:
> All,
>
> I was wondering if tmux could be used as a collaborative tool
> independently. Right now, each attached session gets the same view -
> which is great in the case where you want that behavior (sharing a
> screen etc) but which is not all
Hi
I tried using this patch and the code is horrible.
Can we not use this? This blows goats
Jason
From: Nicholas Marriott
To: Thomas
Cc: tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Allow conditional form
