Re: tmux 1.9 released: A note for users/packagers

2014-02-21 Thread Suraj Kurapati
On Feb 21, 2014 2:33 PM, "Thomas Adam" wrote: > I don't list everything under the sun, I take a view to list those things I > think are more interesting generally. Fair enough. Thanks for your consideration. -- Managing t

Re: tmux 1.9 released: A note for users/packagers

2014-02-21 Thread Thomas Adam
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 01:45:39PM -0800, Suraj Kurapati wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: > > I've released tmux 1.9, please see the CHANGES file for a list of more > > detailed changes. This time, I've tried to make things a little clearer > > about some of the more i

Re: tmux 1.9 released: A note for users/packagers

2014-02-21 Thread Suraj Kurapati
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: > I've released tmux 1.9, please see the CHANGES file for a list of more > detailed changes. This time, I've tried to make things a little clearer > about some of the more important changes users will need to be aware of. Hurray! But this new

Re: tmux 1.9 released: A note for users/packagers

2014-02-21 Thread hubert depesz lubaczewski
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:31:41AM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote: > At 13:15 +0100 21 Feb 2014, hubert depesz lubaczewski > wrote: > >2. is there a way to upgrade tmux without killing programs that run > > under it? > > In the past I've avoided the need to kill some programs being run in > a tmux s

Re: tmux 1.9 released: A note for users/packagers

2014-02-21 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 13:15 +0100 21 Feb 2014, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: 2. is there a way to upgrade tmux without killing programs that run under it? In the past I've avoided the need to kill some programs being run in a tmux session in this situation by using reptyr[1] to temporarily move them out o

Re: tmux 1.9 released: A note for users/packagers

2014-02-21 Thread Thomas Adam
On 21 February 2014 12:15, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > 2. is there a way to upgrade tmux without killing programs that run >under it? No, a protocol bump is a protocol bump and something we try and avoid doing, but when we do, we batch together functionality so that it doesn't need to

Re: tmux 1.9 released: A note for users/packagers

2014-02-21 Thread hubert depesz lubaczewski
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 09:50:40PM +, Thomas Adam wrote: > talk to an older tmux server. The "fix" for this is usually to restart the > tmux server; I'm hoping this is clear enough, and that this is propagated to > the user. Debian allows for this with changelogs, for example. I'm > assuming

Re: tmux 1.9 released: A note for users/packagers

2014-02-21 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi Thomas, Am 20.02.2014 um 22:50 schrieb Thomas Adam : > I've released tmux 1.9, please see the CHANGES file for a list of more > detailed changes. This time, I've tried to make things a little clearer > about some of the more important changes users will need to be aware of. Excellent! The REA

Re: tmux 1.9 released: A note for users/packagers

2014-02-20 Thread Thomas Adam
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:07:42AM +0100, Guido Berhoerster wrote: > * Thomas Adam [2014-02-20 21:50]: > > As usual, the tarball and associated changes can be found here: > > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/tmux/files/tmux/tmux-1.9/ > > The tarball contains object files under compat/.a Oh w

Re: tmux 1.9 released: A note for users/packagers

2014-02-20 Thread Guido Berhoerster
* Thomas Adam [2014-02-20 21:50]: > As usual, the tarball and associated changes can be found here: > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/tmux/files/tmux/tmux-1.9/ The tarball contains object files under compat/. -- Guido Berhoerster --

tmux 1.9 released: A note for users/packagers

2014-02-20 Thread Thomas Adam
All, I've released tmux 1.9, please see the CHANGES file for a list of more detailed changes. This time, I've tried to make things a little clearer about some of the more important changes users will need to be aware of. Note that tmux has undergone a protocol version bump. This is especially i