Nicholas Marriott gmail.com> writes:
> At the moment tmux assumes that 256 colours are set using
> \033[38;5;Xm. This is definitely not ideal.
>
> However it is definitely fine to assume that the 256 colour palette is
> fixed.
>
> But I'm not sure it's fine to assume the aixterm colours are fix
Any progress with this? I'm one of those who would like to see it
implemented. Can't help with the patch though.
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your
Hi
Sorry for the delay.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 01:51:15PM -0500, Peter Lustig wrote:
> On 2/9/2012 4:00 AM, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> >I'd rather not translate aixterm colours on terminals that support them:
> >
> >- They are fewer bytes than the 256 colour equivalents.
> >
> >- We can't predic
On 2/9/2012 4:00 AM, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> I'd rather not translate aixterm colours on terminals that support them:
>
> - They are fewer bytes than the 256 colour equivalents.
>
> - We can't predict what configuration options terminals have - some may
>have the ability to alter the palette
I'd rather not translate aixterm colours on terminals that support them:
- They are fewer bytes than the 256 colour equivalents.
- We can't predict what configuration options terminals have - some may
have the ability to alter the palette for aixterm colours independent
of the 256 colour pale
On 2/5/2012 5:55 PM, Peter Lustig wrote:
On 2/4/2012 9:56 PM, Peter Lustig wrote:
On 1/22/2012 3:44 AM, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
IIRC I sent some comments and heard nothing more.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 10:50:04PM -0500, Peter Lustig wrote:
Sorry to resurrect an old thread.
Does anyone know
On 2/4/2012 9:56 PM, Peter Lustig wrote:
On 1/22/2012 3:44 AM, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
IIRC I sent some comments and heard nothing more.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 10:50:04PM -0500, Peter Lustig wrote:
Sorry to resurrect an old thread.
Does anyone know what became of this patch? I found no mo
On 1/22/2012 3:44 AM, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
IIRC I sent some comments and heard nothing more.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 10:50:04PM -0500, Peter Lustig wrote:
Sorry to resurrect an old thread.
Does anyone know what became of this patch? I found no more discussion
of it after this thread, and
IIRC I sent some comments and heard nothing more.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 10:50:04PM -0500, Peter Lustig wrote:
> Sorry to resurrect an old thread.
>
> Does anyone know what became of this patch? I found no more discussion
> of it after this thread, and see no traces of it in the trunk.
>
> -
Sorry to resurrect an old thread.
Does anyone know what became of this patch? I found no more discussion
of it after this thread, and see no traces of it in the trunk.
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 04:31:22PM -0600, Stephen Prater wrote:
> I have completed a patch to tmux which enables 256 color support in
> fbterm (or any other term that uses non standard 256 color escape
> sequences) as well as xterm / etc.
>
> It does this by honoring terminfo setaf / setab ent
per irc request.
it's a git diff.
i am not an svn person - but I'll figure it out if/when it's ready to
go in.
patch.diff
Description: Binary data
On Jan 20, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Stephen Prater wrote:
I have completed a patch to tmux which enables 256 color support in
fbterm (or any ot
I have completed a patch to tmux which enables 256 color support in
fbterm (or any other term that uses non standard 256 color escape
sequences) as well as xterm / etc.
It does this by honoring terminfo setaf / setab entries for escape
sequences on 256 / 88 color terminals.
i have a few que
13 matches
Mail list logo
