Hi,
but a lot of other projects do and i think that's important. why is
this one different?
if you won't have such a list, would you consider adding something to
the web page telling users how they can find out how the contributors
are? something like the git command mentioned earlier in this ema
All the commit history is in git, we don't need a list somewhere else.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:24:54AM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:12:05PM +, David Chanters wrote:
> > On 16 February 2015 at 15:59, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > > % git log | egrep -o '(from |by )[A-Z
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:12:05PM +, David Chanters wrote:
> On 16 February 2015 at 15:59, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > % git log | egrep -o '(from |by )[A-Z][A-Za-z0-9 ]*\.'|sort|uniq -c|sort
> > -nr| head -n10
> > 40 from Thomas Adam.
> > 39 from George Nachman.
> > 37 from Tiago
On 16 February 2015 at 15:59, Thomas Adam wrote:
> % git log | egrep -o '(from |by )[A-Z][A-Za-z0-9 ]*\.'|sort|uniq -c|sort -nr|
> head -n10
> 40 from Thomas Adam.
> 39 from George Nachman.
> 37 from Tiago Cunha.
> 19 from OpenBSD.
> 17 from Romain Francoise.
> 17 fr
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:30:45PM +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb, 2015 at 17:27:35 GMT, Christopher Ritsen wrote:
> > The point I was trying to make was that it's not necessarily the
> > committer who is doing the work (they might be just applying a patch
> > received
> > from elsewhe
On Mon, 16 Feb, 2015 at 17:27:35 GMT, Christopher Ritsen wrote:
> The point I was trying to make was that it's not necessarily the
> committer who is doing the work (they might be just applying a patch received
> from elsewhere), but it would be expected that they would be attributed as the
> autho
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:02:16AM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> > For a quick glimpse see the analysis at Ohloh:
> > https://www.openhub.net/p/tmux
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 03:59:10PM +, Thomas Adam wrote:
> … the real contributor is part of the commit message itself. See for example:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:02:16AM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > Am 15.02.2015 um 22:28 schrieb Christopher Ritsen :
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 08:54:03PM +, David Chanters wrote:
> >> Did this email make it to the list? Any takers on this?
> >
> > I'll reply as an
Hi David,
> Am 15.02.2015 um 22:28 schrieb Christopher Ritsen :
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 08:54:03PM +, David Chanters wrote:
>> Did this email make it to the list? Any takers on this?
>
> I'll reply as an echo. I don't think there is a large community developer
> around this project, mos
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 08:54:03PM +, David Chanters wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did this email make it to the list? Any takers on this?
>
> David
I'll reply as an echo. I don't think there is a large community developer
around this project, mostly two people the last time I checked. Git history
is
Hi,
Did this email make it to the list? Any takers on this?
David
On 5 February 2015 at 22:10, David Chanters
wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm really enjoying tmux, and thank you to everyone who makes it possible!
>
> What's the story behind tmux, and how did it start? Having read the
> tmux FAQ,
Hey everyone,
I'm really enjoying tmux, and thank you to everyone who makes it possible!
What's the story behind tmux, and how did it start? Having read the
tmux FAQ, it's clear the author wasn't keen on the gnu screen code.
What difficulties were encountered in writing tmux from scratch?
tmux b
12 matches
Mail list logo
