Hi
I just removed the comment entirely, I think it's clear enough what the
code is doing.
Cheers
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:07:30PM -0700, Jonathan Daugherty wrote:
> > Applied with some fairly unimportant style changes, thanks.
>
> Thanks! I just realized that there is a stale comment in my
> Applied with some fairly unimportant style changes, thanks.
Thanks! I just realized that there is a stale comment in my patch
which made it into yours: a comment mentions 'match_title' but that
variable was from a previous version that didn't make it into my final
patch. Whoops.
--
Jonatha
Applied with some fairly unimportant style changes, thanks.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 09:15:18AM -0700, Jonathan Daugherty wrote:
> > But that's four diffs... just -T -N -C would be ok but if you do one
> > -T flag I think we should have all three.
>
> Please see the attached patch, which adds -T
> But that's four diffs... just -T -N -C would be ok but if you do one
> -T flag I think we should have all three.
Please see the attached patch, which adds -T, -C, and -N options for
find-window and defaults to -TCN as discussed. I've also updated
tmux.1.
--
Jonathan Daugherty
Software Eng
> You could use window ids (@1 etc) if you want to go to a specific window
> but of course that means you need to look them up first.
Yeah, it's true, I'd like to avoid that.
> I'd be happy with improvements to find-window but I think if we are
> adding flags then we should have flags for all the
You could use window ids (@1 etc) if you want to go to a specific window
but of course that means you need to look them up first.
I'd be happy with improvements to find-window but I think if we are
adding flags then we should have flags for all the possibilities, so -T
for title, -N for name, -C f
