Yeah I thought about this again and I think it is fine. Applied to
OpenBSD, will be in SF later, thanks.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:15:06PM -0300, Tiago Resende wrote:
> On Friday, 2011-04-15, at 08:31:26 +0200, Hannes von Haugwitz wrote:
> > > Since there is already a means of altering a user's
On Sunday, 2011-04-17, at 20:43:20 +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Hmm, code looks fine but we already have things that are different from
> both vi and emacs and I'm not sure such a small thing is worth making
> copy mode even more complicated...
I'd also like to point out to my fellow vim user
Hmm, code looks fine but we already have things that are different from
both vi and emacs and I'm not sure such a small thing is worth making
copy mode even more complicated...
I guess the change is small so it can't do too much harm and both vi and
emacs modes do get tested.
On Fri, Apr 15, 201
On Friday, 2011-04-15, at 10:44:08 -0700, Aaron Bull Schaefer wrote:
> Yes, this WORKS! I tested both emacs and vi modes and this is exactly
> what I was looking for. Thanks for such a quick patch!
My pleasure. :)
I hope you don't mind that I cc this to the list, just to let the record
show.
--
On Friday, 2011-04-15, at 08:31:26 +0200, Hannes von Haugwitz wrote:
> > Since there is already a means of altering a user's key binding
> > preference using the mode-keys option, I thought it would be a nice if
> > tmux would adjust the selection behavior based on that value as well.
>
> I second
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 04:23:16PM -0700, Aaron Bull Schaefer wrote:
> When copying a block of text in copy-mode, I found it surprising that
> the paste buffer did not contain the right-most character of the
> selection. This is true whether the cursor is on the left side or the
> right side of the
