Applied, thanks.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 05:12:36PM -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 09:03:03 +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > - -F pane_index, need the latest version.
>
> Attached. They apply on top of the window_pane_index fix.
>
> --Ben
> From eda10065bbcc951ce4df8cc86
Applied thanks.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 05:11:52PM -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 09:03:03 +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > - window_pane_index change is a
> > separate thing I guess.
>
> Attached.
>
> --Ben
> From a1da8eef7dec2
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 09:03:03 +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> - -F pane_index, need the latest version.
Attached. They apply on top of the window_pane_index fix.
--Ben
From eda10065bbcc951ce4df8cc86979b0ae0262d0b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Boeckel
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:10:04 -0
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 09:03:03 +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> - window_pane_index change is a
> separate thing I guess.
Attached.
--Ben
From a1da8eef7dec2fd729927d33ebc6c3bfde54031a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Boeckel
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 1
You sent bits to add -F pane_index and also to change window_pane_index to
return (u_int)-1 together, but window_pane_index should behave like
window_index (return an int).
So have I got the latest stuff to add -F pane_index?
What else have I got from you that is still outstanding?
- Word motion
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 23:48:05 +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Can you resend the diff apart from the window index change and I'll
> apply it?
Sorry, a little confused here; probably shouldn't do hacking this late.
What is needed exactly?
--Ben
pgpqiuU2M6ksR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Can you resend the diff apart from the window index change and I'll
apply it?
Thanks
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:09:58PM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 02:17:19 +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > Did you send a diff changing window_pane_index to behave like
> > window_index?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 02:17:19 +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Did you send a diff changing window_pane_index to behave like
> window_index? I've got so many files all starting 000* now that I'm
> confused ;-).
Should be 0005-Change-window_pane_index-to-be-like-window_index.patch
and 0006-Add-
Did you send a diff changing window_pane_index to behave like
window_index? I've got so many files all starting 000* now that I'm
confused ;-).
Or if you want to do that separately can you resend just the latest bits
for the pane index format string?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 02:38:49PM -0400, Be
And add back the line format string that I deleted. Didn't realize that
it wasn't just a hack for pane_index.
--Ben
From d18fd48cdf53b6affcb3b67a5a89861f0590046f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Boeckel
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:30:23 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] Add line back to the format strin
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 07:59:42 +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Seems fine, but instead of returning (u_int)-1 can we change it to work
> like window_index.
Seems reasonable. Patch attached (applies on top of previous patches).
--Ben
From 75cdc56b9bbe2b5b25fd9374d73006325b04a345 Mon Sep 17 00:
Hi
Seems fine, but instead of returning (u_int)-1 can we change it to work
like window_index.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:25:25PM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The -F flag is great! I found out that pane_index was not implemented
> however. The first patch adds pane_index to the format_tre
12 matches
Mail list logo
