On 7 February 2014 22:32, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I thought my patch would be committed using "git am" (in which case,
> the lengthy description I wrote would become the commit log and my
> name would appear in the author field) but it wasn't.
No, the commit comes from OpenBSD's CV
On 7 February 2014 20:16, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> The discussion in ticket #97 http://sourceforge.net/p/tmux/tickets/97/
> seems to validate my patch.
>
> That makes me wonder... has it already been accepted into the tmux codebase?
>
> If so, could you please tell me the commit SH
Hi Thomas,
I thought my patch would be committed using "git am" (in which case,
the lengthy description I wrote would become the commit log and my
name would appear in the author field) but it wasn't.
As a result, I couldn't find my patch in the "git log" output.
And so I asked here. :-)
Thanks
Hi Nicholas,
The discussion in ticket #97 http://sourceforge.net/p/tmux/tickets/97/
seems to validate my patch.
That makes me wonder... has it already been accepted into the tmux codebase?
If so, could you please tell me the commit SHA so I can verify?
Thanks for your consideration.
On Wed, Ja
Sorry for the late reply. I totally missed this thread (again) in my inbox.
These changes seem fine to me... whatever gets my patch accepted! ;)
I re-used *wp instead of adding a new member because I wanted to
minimize the amount of changes I made to the codebase. The less
changes I make, the e
hi
take a look at this please - tweaked style and naming somewhat,
particularly we have never used focus for anything apart from the focus
events before so no reason to start now
also used a new member of layout_cell otherwise it changes the layout
string
(this seems like another thing that shou
On 1/9/14, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Could you resend your entire patch please? I haven't had time to look at
> it yet and when I do it'd be easier if I have the whole thing in one
> email.
Sorry for the delay. I have re-sent the entire patch as a reply to this thread.
Could you resend your entire patch please? I haven't had time to look at
it yet and when I do it'd be easier if I have the whole thing in one
email.
Thanks
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 08:31:44AM -0800, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Hello,
>
> There was a bug in my original patch where `tmux s
Hello,
Hello,
There was a bug in my original patch where `tmux select-pane` would
segfault if the current window had only 1 pane.
The following changes fix that bug:
diff --git a/window.c b/window.c
index 7412a4d..adb67e0 100644
--- a/window.c
+++ b/window.c
@@ -1163,9 +1163,10 @@ window_pane_r
