Hi
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 08:50:09AM -0700, George Nachman wrote:
>On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Nicholas Marriott
><[1]nicholas.marri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> - I think you don't need s->id and next_session_id because s->idx is
> *unique and ever-increasing (it
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Nicholas Marriott <
nicholas.marri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> - I think you don't need s->id and next_session_id because s->idx is
> unique and ever-increasing (it is impossible to renumber sessions).
>
>
This makes it more difficult to add the ability to renum
