Re: My dream: a pointy-clicky tmux frontend

2011-05-04 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Hi This is what I did, not much but I didn't have a lot of time... not sure if it'll still apply. Let me know if you have any questions. Index: client.c === RCS file: /cvsroot/tmux/tmux/client.c,v retrieving revision 1.100 diff -u

Re: My dream: a pointy-clicky tmux frontend

2011-05-03 Thread George Nachman
Hi Nicholas, I've got some time coming up to work on this. Can you send me whatever you've done so far? Thanks, George On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > Yep this is a cool idea and I am happy but that George wrote up the > design doc but I haven't had time up to now a

Re: [iterm2-discuss] My dream: a pointy-clicky tmux frontend

2011-03-28 Thread Nicholas Marriott
tmux only uses the socket to pass the client environment and file descriptors up to the server and for some other odds and sods like telling the client to detach and suspend. Everything else is done directly by the server. So it isn't really useful for a full terminal display. The idea is that we'

Re: [iterm2-discuss] My dream: a pointy-clicky tmux frontend

2011-03-28 Thread Kekoa Proudfoot
You didn't quite describe it this way, but it sort of sounds like you are describing something like VNC for text terminals, with tmux as the server and tmux/iTerm2 as clients. I like that overall idea. In fact it would be pretty awesome. :) I already script up tmux so I can get the most basic fu

Re: [iterm2-discuss] My dream: a pointy-clicky tmux frontend

2011-03-28 Thread Kekoa Proudfoot
I didn't mean iTerm2 should talk to tmux's socket directly, more that there is already a protocol used over the socket. Why not have iTerm2 reuse it? -Kekoa On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:01 PM, George Nachman wrote: >> In a sense tmux is already client/server via a socket in /tmp but I >> don't kn

Re: [iterm2-discuss] My dream: a pointy-clicky tmux frontend

2011-03-24 Thread George Nachman
This idea had been considered before but perhaps rejected too early. I'm curious to hear what Nicholas thinks about it when he gets back. Would it be too painful to maintain two clients? On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Kekoa Proudfoot wrote: > I didn't mean iTerm2 should talk to tmux's socket di

Re: [iterm2-discuss] My dream: a pointy-clicky tmux frontend

2011-03-24 Thread George Nachman
> > In a sense tmux is already client/server via a socket in /tmp but I > don't know if the protocol was done in a way that would allow new > clients to be written easily. The advantage of making the tmux client talk to iTerm2 over having iTerm2 communicate directly with tmux's socket is that you

Re: My dream: a pointy-clicky tmux frontend

2011-03-23 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Yep this is a cool idea and I am happy but that George wrote up the design doc but I haven't had time up to now although I did some basic work and yes if anyone is interested in carrying on then let me know and I will have time to give help if necessary. Many of the changes are relatively simple.

My dream: a pointy-clicky tmux frontend

2011-03-23 Thread Joshua Keroes
Imagine a reinvented terminal app. First, let's use tmux as the backend. Users would get autodetech and the safety that comes with it automatically. Session moves and dupes also come free. We have this functionality today if you're clever with your startup dotfiles. This isn't new. Merging tmux a