Applied, thanks!
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 09:18:28PM -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 21:15:30 -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 00:24:00 -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > > dev/add-WORD-motions-to-status
> > > Adds 'B', 'E', and 'W' motions to edit m
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 21:15:30 -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 00:24:00 -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > dev/add-WORD-motions-to-status
> > Adds 'B', 'E', and 'W' motions to edit mode. Not sure of emacs
> > equivalents.
>
> Works here. It uses the emacs 'E' b
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 00:24:00 -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> dev/add-WORD-motions-to-status
> Adds 'B', 'E', and 'W' motions to edit mode. Not sure of emacs
> equivalents.
Works here. It uses the emacs 'E' behavior. I have another branch here
which fixes the behavior when vi be
>
> > dev/use-format-tree-in-display (NEEDS DOCS)
> > Allow formatting like list-* commands in the statusline (client
> > and session formats globally) and display-message (which also
> > adds the window and pane formats).
> >
> >
e (which also
> adds the window and pane formats).
>
> dev/features
> Integration branch with all of the above merged in. This is what
> I'm using on my development machines.
>
> I'd like to get testing for these besides my use. Also input
;m using on my development machines.
I'd like to get testing for these besides my use. Also input from emacs
users as to what the equivalent bindings for some of the vi bindings
are. Also master is a bit behind.
Fair warning: I rebase feature branches (especially since master grabs
the pa
