* Thomas Adam [12-03-12 18:25]:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 10:59:39AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> >From my history of this list it appears Mr. Adams posts *directly* to the
>
> That would be "Mr. Adam", given my surname is Adam, not Adams. There is
> only one of me, not many.
My appoligies.
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 10:59:39AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>From my history of this list it appears Mr. Adams posts *directly* to the
That would be "Mr. Adam", given my surname is Adam, not Adams. There is
only one of me, not many.
I am amazed I am even having to respond to this sort of O
Hello.
2012/12/03 10:59:39 -0500 Patrick Shanahan => To
tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net :
PS> > PS> > TA> [Adding back tmux-users@ to Cc list. Please don't cull it next
time.]
PS> > PS> >
PS> > PS> > thought I did. No X-Mailing-List comes here so mutt's 'list-reply'
doesn't
PS> > PS> > work
* Peter Vereshagin [12-03-12 10:33]:
> 2012/12/03 09:28:17 -0500 Patrick Shanahan => To
> tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net :
> PS> > TA> [Adding back tmux-users@ to Cc list. Please don't cull it next
> time.]
> PS> >
> PS> > thought I did. No X-Mailing-List comes here so mutt's 'list-reply'
Hello.
2012/12/03 09:28:17 -0500 Patrick Shanahan => To
tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net :
PS> > TA> [Adding back tmux-users@ to Cc list. Please don't cull it next time.]
PS> >
PS> > thought I did. No X-Mailing-List comes here so mutt's 'list-reply' doesn't
PS> > work.
PS> >
PS>
PS> odd, it
* Peter Vereshagin [12-03-12 01:45]:
> Hello.
>
> 2012/12/02 14:34:15 + Thomas Adam => To Peter
> Vereshagin :
> TA> [Adding back tmux-users@ to Cc list. Please don't cull it next time.]
>
> thought I did. No X-Mailing-List comes here so mutt's 'list-reply' doesn't
> work.
>
odd, it wor
Hello.
2012/12/02 14:34:15 + Thomas Adam => To Peter
Vereshagin :
TA> [Adding back tmux-users@ to Cc list. Please don't cull it next time.]
thought I did. No X-Mailing-List comes here so mutt's 'list-reply' doesn't
work.
TA> No. You seem to be under the impression that client <-> server
[Adding back tmux-users@ to Cc list. Please don't cull it next time.]
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 05:05:20PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 2012/12/02 09:18:19 + Thomas Adam => To Peter
> Vereshagin :
> TA> > tmux-ruby seems to invoke_command(). Is this the only possible way to
>
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 12:13:59PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> tmux-ruby seems to invoke_command(). Is this the only possible way to send a
> request to tmux-server and receive a response?
Yes.
> What I'm expecting is: the 'server and clients' concept sound about a protocol
> and its spec to
Hello.
2012/12/01 21:31:51 + Thomas Adam => To Peter
Vereshagin :
TA> On 1 December 2012 20:22, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
TA> > Should also like to know if the DSL (e. g., Perl) interface for Tmux
protocol
TA> > client implementation shall ever be available which way to be notified
about
TA
On 1 December 2012 20:22, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Should also like to know if the DSL (e. g., Perl) interface for Tmux protocol
> client implementation shall ever be available which way to be notified about
> that in time (before too long) is the best?
I do not understand the question. Are you
Hello.
2012/11/30 16:42:51 + Thomas Adam => To Peter
Vereshagin :
TA> That's because they use the generated configure script already. In the case
TA> of using Git, you're having to bootstrap the creation of those files.
Cool my guess was right: the different build methods.
Should also lik
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:36:59PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Ouch! it's not a Perl area. My disclaimer: I had got the VCS version and can
> not
> build it. First thing, the autogen.sh, said:
Edit autogen.sh and comment out the two lines in that script which set
AUTOMAKE_VERSION and AUTOCON
Hello.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting#Top-posting
'the most vocal objections to top-posting seem to come from persons who
first went online in the earlier days'
Deprecation? Ok not a big deal...
I mean no insist of the major part of community to use Tmux for me to want to
tell
Top-posting? I just replied directly to the group post...
In terms of p5p. I don't know how many there would use Tmux, but I was just
thinking that being able to use the perl debugger from within a forked process
is one of the things which many people would perhaps try, *if* they knew about
it. It
Hello.
No top-posting, please. Thank you.
2012/11/30 10:29:51 +0100 Richard Foley => To Peter
Vereshagin :
RF> Very nice work, Peter.
RF>
RF> I presume you've notified P5P, and the perl debugger mailing list, and wider
RF> perl community, of this *highly* interesting release?
RF>
RF> > This i
Very nice work, Peter.
I presume you've notified P5P, and the perl debugger mailing list, and wider
perl community, of this *highly* interesting release?
--
Ciao
Richard Foley
http://www.rfi.net/books.html
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:03:25PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> This is
Hello.
This is to acknowledge that new Perl module was released to the public that is
aimed to use Tmux for Perl development, particularly to provide a terminal
device to debug code that fork()s. More info:
http://gitweb.vereshagin.org/Debug-Fork-Tmux/README.html
I believe it's a good news for
18 matches
Mail list logo
