trc. The post would be to the poster and cc the list as he presently
PS> appears to prefer.
Can't think of it as a Tmux problem.
List messages arrival is later and is less reliable. Also, it has a commercial
added here which is not a plus. If the dupes are the problem then it's eas
PS> nor do I see the necessity to cc: list posts unless an individual requests
PS> an *additional* copy ???
Depends.
--
Peter Vereshagin (http://vereshagin.org) pgp: A0E26627
--
Keep yoursel
Hello.
2012/12/02 14:34:15 + Thomas Adam => To Peter
Vereshagin :
TA> [Adding back tmux-users@ to Cc list. Please don't cull it next time.]
thought I did. No X-Mailing-List comes here so mutt's 'list-reply' doesn't
work.
TA> No. You seem to be under the
Hello.
2012/12/01 21:31:51 + Thomas Adam => To Peter
Vereshagin :
TA> On 1 December 2012 20:22, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
TA> > Should also like to know if the DSL (e. g., Perl) interface for Tmux
protocol
TA> > client implementation shall ever be available which way to
Hello.
2012/11/30 16:42:51 + Thomas Adam => To Peter
Vereshagin :
TA> That's because they use the generated configure script already. In the case
TA> of using Git, you're having to bootstrap the creation of those files.
Cool my guess was right: the different build me
:
aclocal aclocal-1.10 aclocal-1.12 aclocal-1.4
Shall I try the patches from freebsd port? Does the build process from
downloadable archive differs from the one found in Git? Debug::Fork::Tmux's
build process does.
2012/11/30 14:36:53 +0100 Richard Foley => To Peter
Veresha
Hello.
No top-posting, please. Thank you.
2012/11/30 10:29:51 +0100 Richard Foley => To Peter
Vereshagin :
RF> Very nice work, Peter.
RF>
RF> I presume you've notified P5P, and the perl debugger mailing list, and wider
RF> perl community, of this *highly* interesting rele
nice guys (Nicholas Marriott and, and ...) for Tmux and
for helping me here, too.
Thank you!
--
Peter Vereshagin (http://vereshagin.org) pgp: A0E26627
--
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel:
TUNE You got it built. Now ma
Hello.
Cool! I just needed to upgrade tmux version from 1.3.
2012/09/30 23:47:02 +0100 Nicholas Marriott => To
Peter Vereshagin :
NM> tmux neww -PF'#{pane_tty}'
'neww' doesn't seem to have the '-F' with 1.6. Does/should it have that feature
in a late
ame out of 'new-window' command. Is
there any other way to do this that can be recommended? Or should I file such
a feature request exactly as it sounds here?
Thank you.
--
Peter Vereshagin (http://vereshagin.org) pgp: A0E26627
--
You can leave your hat on, Nicholas!
It appears to work for me this way:
tmux -S /tmp/tmux-abcd
Thank you!
2010/11/04 14:22:48 + Nicholas Marriott => To
Peter Vereshagin :
NM> Make a new tmux server that is jailed using -L.
NM>
NM>
NM> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 04:11:17
You can leave your hats on, tmux-users!
I need to chroot to the existent running freebsd jail(4), the separate
chroot-like environment.
screen works ok, but not tmux. Tmux somehow knbows out about the jail running
in there and runs my shell in a jail.
SYstem is freebsd-7.3 as of september, and t
12 matches
Mail list logo
