hooks if they are ever finished.
> >
> > What are "hooks" in this context?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --nwf;
> >
> > > On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 01:59:26PM -0400, Nathaniel W Filardo wrote:
> > > > Greetings list,
> > > >
&
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 10:59:21PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
>[useful feedback]
Here's take 2; it should (unless I goofed) incorporate all your feedback.
Thanks!
--nwf;
diff --git a/cmd-new-session.c b/cmd-new-session.c
index b36de70..d23fea1 100644
--- a/cmd-new-session.c
+++ b/cmd-new-session.c
need some way to wait for the
individual task running on a given pane to exit.
> This seems like a job for hooks if they are ever finished.
What are "hooks" in this context?
Thanks,
--nwf;
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 01:59:26PM -0400, Nathaniel W Filardo wrote:
> > Greeti
Greetings list,
The attached patch adds options to new-window, new-session, and split-window
(commands which create panes) to signal a wait_channel when that pane is
destroyed, for example after the contained process exits. Towards this end,
it changes the life-cycle management code in cmd-wait-f
