Re: tmux Git (eventual 2.0 release): Incompatible Changes

2014-04-26 Thread Michael Treibton
On 26 April 2014 18:02, Thomas Adam wrote: > AFAIAC, this is such a minor thing, that if those few people who really > are using it are this affected, then they can email me personally and I > will help them script equivalent functionality using some external > process and tmux. > OK. Can I ask,

Re: tmux Git (eventual 2.0 release): Incompatible Changes

2014-04-26 Thread Michael Treibton
Hi, On 23 April 2014 14:42, Thomas Adam wrote: > On 23 April 2014 14:24, Michael Treibton wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 23 April 2014 11:33, Thomas Adam wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> This is a courtesy email for anyone who is curre

Re: tmux Git (eventual 2.0 release): Incompatible Changes

2014-04-23 Thread Michael Treibton
Hi, On 23 April 2014 11:33, Thomas Adam wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a courtesy email for anyone who is currently tracking the SF Git > version of tmux. I've just pushed a bunch of updates out which will result > in the breakage of some people's configuration, namely: > > * The 'monitor-content

Tmux CVS version from sf.net (as of 02/04/11) refreshes contents at intervals?

2011-04-02 Thread Michael Treibton
Hi all, Sorry for the rather cryptic subject, but I've had some interesting observations using the CVS version of tmux from sf.net. I am running this on Debian Linux (Unstable a.k.a "Sid) using a kernel of 2.6.37-2-686 should it matter. I can't recall since when, but since I've been running tha