* Jason Timrod [04-26-13 18:10]:
[...]
> So i think getting rid of that problem is simple - and i am the only one
> pushing my opinion.
And the only thing you are pushing besides people's buttons is your
*opinion*.
Since your opinion is worth very little, or less, where is your *better*
versi
I don't need to be far away to voice myself. I do not understand why no one
else agrees with me or voices their concerns. Cowards. You clearly share my
opinion as well.
Jason
--
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this
Dear Jason,
you are still not far enough away from the keyboard.
On 27/04/13 00:08, Jason Timrod wrote:
> I am voicing [...] shit, [...] and it's not good enough.
--
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New
I dont think i've crossed a line.
Even you say you agree with me - that theres been mistakes yet not a lot to put
them right.
I am voicing that these mistakes are happening to many times - and thomas is
the person making them. So what if that means thomas is the fall-guy for this?
Its his shit,
[...]
> Thomas, you're [...]
Ok you crossed a thick red line right there. Would you bloody please
stop insulting ANYONE on ANY public opinion forum EVER AGAIN?
Please take some time far off a keyboard and reflect your demeanour. How
you dare spewing rants of disrespect at people whose hard labour
Hi Nicholas,
Am 25.04.2013 um 23:57 schrieb Nicholas Marriott :
> The relevant license/copyright is at the top of every source file, I
> don't think we need it in another place. Note that it differs for some
> files in compat/ and examples/.
I see. OpenCSW has the policy to include the license fi
> >
> > So - is this feature available or no?
>
> Read about grouped sessions.
>
> -- Thomas Adam
>
Thanks, I was looking for a term to do an effective search, and that worked
well. Question - how scalable are grouped sessions? With screen, I'd
regularly get hangs with 3 or so independent sessions
If you have nothing constructive to offer then please keep quiet.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 05:58:56PM -0700, Jason Timrod wrote:
>Hi
>I tried using this patch and the code is horrible.
>Can we not use this? This blows goats
>Jason
>
>--