Re: [perl] Tmux rocks - it debugs fork()s

2012-12-02 Thread Peter Vereshagin
Hello. 2012/12/02 14:34:15 + Thomas Adam => To Peter Vereshagin : TA> [Adding back tmux-users@ to Cc list. Please don't cull it next time.] thought I did. No X-Mailing-List comes here so mutt's 'list-reply' doesn't work. TA> No. You seem to be under the impression that client <-> server

Re: [perl] Tmux rocks - it debugs fork()s

2012-12-02 Thread Thomas Adam
[Adding back tmux-users@ to Cc list. Please don't cull it next time.] On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 05:05:20PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote: > Hello. > > 2012/12/02 09:18:19 + Thomas Adam => To Peter > Vereshagin : > TA> > tmux-ruby seems to invoke_command(). Is this the only possible way to >

Re: [perl] Tmux rocks - it debugs fork()s

2012-12-02 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 12:13:59PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote: > tmux-ruby seems to invoke_command(). Is this the only possible way to send a > request to tmux-server and receive a response? Yes. > What I'm expecting is: the 'server and clients' concept sound about a protocol > and its spec to

Re: [perl] Tmux rocks - it debugs fork()s

2012-12-02 Thread Peter Vereshagin
Hello. 2012/12/01 21:31:51 + Thomas Adam => To Peter Vereshagin : TA> On 1 December 2012 20:22, Peter Vereshagin wrote: TA> > Should also like to know if the DSL (e. g., Perl) interface for Tmux protocol TA> > client implementation shall ever be available which way to be notified about TA