Hi,
* Nicholas Marriott [120905 07:25]:
> Hmm. I see anything wrong, can you let me know if it happens again?
I've been using tmux more or less every day since the reported crash
and have experienced no problems whatsoever, will definitely pass
along news of any mishaps. BTW, really enjoying hav
Hi,
On 2 October 2012 08:54, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> I'd like explicit expand/collapse as well so added them back, also with
OK. I just assumed they'd be redundant if we had a toggle, but sure,
they can go back in. :)
> some trivial renaming of a couple of things I don't like the look of a
Applied now.
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:13:22AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2 October 2012 08:54, Nicholas Marriott
> wrote:
> > I'd like explicit expand/collapse as well so added them back, also with
>
> OK. I just assumed they'd be redundant if we had a toggle, but sure,
> they
Applied thanks.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:34:23PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> The format of list-keys matches the commands tmux parsed, rather than the
> older format of specifying those keys which didn't have a prefix with "(no
> prefix)". Since there's no reason to single out keys with no pref
No you need to use a new tmux with `` or $(), doesn't do any harm anyway.
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:41:53PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Cool! I just needed to upgrade tmux version from 1.3.
>
> 2012/09/30 23:47:02 +0100 Nicholas Marriott =>
> To Peter Vereshagin :
> NM> tmux
I'd like explicit expand/collapse as well so added them back, also with
some trivial renaming of a couple of things I don't like the look of and
a nuclear reformat of the mode-key.c tables. Look ok?
Index: mode-key.c
===
RCS file: /c
