Discovered this working on a tmux-related selinux issue,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723391 ; apparently tmux
really really really wants to know what command line it was run
with, since it checks about 2 times a second:
19:39:14 munmap(0x2b42928aa000, 4096) = 0
19:39:14 gettime
might support tmpfs, dunno. panic was in vfs so could help
although this is not really a problem anyone but apple can fix, userland
programs should not be able to panic the kernel
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:23:03PM -0400, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Jul 24, 2011 at 03:18 AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wro
On Jul 24, 2011 at 03:18 AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
>maybe try putting it on a memory FS
>
>do you have anything tmux uses on something other than HFS+?
Not that I know of. I've not done anything at all to the standard OS X
Macbook install. One main partition that everything is on.
I'm
maybe try putting it on a memory FS
do you have anything tmux uses on something other than HFS+?
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:11:49PM -0400, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Jul 24, 2011 at 02:35 AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> >What filesystem are you using for /tmp (or whereever the tmux sockets
> >are
On Jul 24, 2011 at 02:35 AM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
>What filesystem are you using for /tmp (or whereever the tmux sockets
>are)?
HFS+, the OS X default.
--
Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention
Re
What filesystem are you using for /tmp (or whereever the tmux sockets
are)?
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:05:25AM -0400, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2011 at 07:50 PM -0400, Tim Gray wrote:
> >While I was just able to cause 1 or 2 panics *with* the wrapper enabled
> >(but not consistently), I was no
On Jul 22, 2011 at 07:50 PM -0400, Tim Gray wrote:
>While I was just able to cause 1 or 2 panics *with* the wrapper enabled
>(but not consistently), I was not able to cause any with it disabled.
>I'll try running like this for a bit and see what I come up with.
Brief followup. At the end of the n
Thanks :-).
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:05:17PM +0200, Richard Foley wrote:
> No list sounds fine, I'm no c programmer so it's irrelevant (to me) in any
> case.
>
> JFTR - I'm glad there's a tmux though, I used to try to get screen to do what
> I wanted, and it was always a struggle. tmux work
No list sounds fine, I'm no c programmer so it's irrelevant (to me) in any
case.
JFTR - I'm glad there's a tmux though, I used to try to get screen to do what
I wanted, and it was always a struggle. tmux worked more or less straight out
of the box and, as or more importantly, inutitively, an e
I don't think I want the extra maintenance hassle of maintaining a file
manually and I'm not sure there is any evidence it'd encourage
contributions.
Either people want to write code and send it or they don't, I don't
think putting their name anywhere else is going to help :-). All commit
messages
10 matches
Mail list logo
