Tiago Resende wrote:
> I was thinking, urxvt has always (I think) supported italics, so unless
> your build was specifically patched to remove it (not disable it during
> /configure, because if that was the case, urxvt _would_ render italics
> as reverse), maybe you are just missing a font with it
Hi
I don't know about this because an empty variable is not the same as
being unset and I think it is confusing to treat them the same. But
maybe I'm just being pedantic, I can't really think of a case where
having an empty LC_ALL or LC_CTYPE would be useful...
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:57:30PM
Hi,
On Friday 15 of April 2011 01:19:10 Tiago Resende wrote:
> I also figured out why it wasn't working for me without -u. My LC_ALL,
> instead of being unset, was set to an empty string. So, tmux was
> assuming I was utf8-less instead of going on to check LC_CTYPE and LANG.
> In conclusion, plea
On Friday, 2011-04-15, at 10:44:08 -0700, Aaron Bull Schaefer wrote:
> Yes, this WORKS! I tested both emacs and vi modes and this is exactly
> what I was looking for. Thanks for such a quick patch!
My pleasure. :)
I hope you don't mind that I cc this to the list, just to let the record
show.
--
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 06:57:30PM +, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
sure. let me know when you've got it working
Konsole patch is now applied in upstream and should be released in KDE
4.7. Then it is possible to create such behaviour by configuration
only since alternate screen buffer status can
On Friday, 2011-04-15, at 08:31:26 +0200, Hannes von Haugwitz wrote:
> > Since there is already a means of altering a user's key binding
> > preference using the mode-keys option, I thought it would be a nice if
> > tmux would adjust the selection behavior based on that value as well.
>
> I second
On Friday, 2011-04-15, at 12:30:21 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Tiago Resende wrote:
> > I'm gonna take a guess here. I think urxvt is reporting to support sitm
> > when it actually doesn't, then screen-256color does its switch between
> > sitm and smso, then less requests standout but gets italics
Tiago Resende wrote:
> I'm gonna take a guess here. I think urxvt is reporting to support sitm
> when it actually doesn't, then screen-256color does its switch between
> sitm and smso, then less requests standout but gets italics instead,
> which urxvt simply refuses to render. I just reproduced i
