Re: "bold colours" and xterm-256color

2009-09-24 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Hmm okay, I managed to use \e for one entry and \E for the other... :-/ time to cut down on the beer I guess ;-). On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:05:14PM +0200, Frank Terbeck wrote: > Nicholas Marriott : > > Did you use \e or \E in terminal-overrides? tmux expects \e but terminfo > > uses > > \E whic

Re: "bold colours" and xterm-256color

2009-09-24 Thread Frank Terbeck
Nicholas Marriott : > Did you use \e or \E in terminal-overrides? tmux expects \e but terminfo uses > \E which won't work in tmux. Heh, well. I indeed used \E, as you used both in your example line earlier and infocmp's output used \E, too. So, I tried both as \E when mixing \E and \e had failed..

Re: "bold colours" and xterm-256color

2009-09-24 Thread Frank Terbeck
Nicholas Marriott : > Maybe I got the terminal-overrides string wrong, can you run tmux server-info > after starting tmux with it set and tell me what setaf and setab are set to? This is what I get: 68: setab: (string) E[4%p1%dm 69: setaf: (string) E[3%p1%dm Regards, Frank --

Re: "bold colours" and xterm-256color

2009-09-24 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Maybe I got the terminal-overrides string wrong, can you run tmux server-info after starting tmux with it set and tell me what setaf and setab are set to? On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 08:41:47PM +0200, Frank Terbeck wrote: > Nicholas Marriott : > > There are differences in how setaf is defined between

Re: "bold colours" and xterm-256color

2009-09-24 Thread Frank Terbeck
Nicholas Marriott : > There are differences in how setaf is defined between xterm and > xterm-256color: > > $ TERM=xterm tput setaf 4|cat -v; echo > ^[[34m > $ TERM=xterm-256color tput setaf 4|cat -v; echo > ^[[38;5;4m > > So, when you do: > > $ printf '\e[1;34mabc' > > tmux sets colour 4 usin

Re: "bold colours" and xterm-256color

2009-09-24 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Hi There are differences in how setaf is defined between xterm and xterm-256color: $ TERM=xterm tput setaf 4|cat -v; echo ^[[34m $ TERM=xterm-256color tput setaf 4|cat -v; echo ^[[38;5;4m So, when you do: $ printf '\e[1;34mabc' tmux sets colour 4 using setaf which with xterm-256color ends up a

Re: "bold colours" and xterm-256color

2009-09-24 Thread Frank Terbeck
Nicholas Marriott : > Are you expecting a bold font as well? Well, no. I'm using the following resources, that should turn off bold characters everywhere in xterm: [snip] XTerm*font: -*-terminus-*-*-*-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-*-* XTerm*boldFont: -*-terminus-*-*-*-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-

Re: "bold colours" and xterm-256color

2009-09-24 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Hi Are you expecting a bold font as well? It works fine for me with putty, I'll try xterm when I get home. There are various implementations of bold in 256 colour mode, https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2810418&group_id=200378&atid=973265 may be related. On Thu, Sep 24, 2009

"bold colours" and xterm-256color

2009-09-24 Thread Frank Terbeck
Hey list! I've been playing around with a 256 colour xterm and tmux. I've been following the FAQ entry and that worked. With one exception. Colours with bold attribute appear as if the bold attribute wasn't there. I used this to test: [snip] printf '\e[01;34mfoo\n' printf '\e[34mfoo\n' [snap] T