On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Martin Thomson
wrote:
> On 4 August 2015 at 10:24, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
>> The consistency you want to see seems to be
>> consistency with the AES GCM cipher suites, rather than with TLS 1.2.
>
> Yes, this is correct.
>
> RFC
it requires
additional code.
Thanks,
Wan-Teh Chang
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
at
want to do 0-RTT PSK across an application shutdown will need to deal
with the harder problem of storing PSKs persistently.
Wan-Teh Chang
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Hi Eric,
Thank you for the reply.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
>>
>> [...] I am curious to know how we concluded that 0-RTT PSK is simpler to
>> implement. Did anyone implement both 0-R
