What's the story on backwards compatibility between TLS 1.2 session
resumption and TLS 1.3 session resumption? Appendix D. Backward
Compatibility doesn't seem to say anything about it. It seems like TLS
1.2 session resumption is gonna keep using TLS 1.2 even if both sides
support TLS 1.3?
ons, and newer
> versions. The server evaluates its preferences and then only resumes
> if the session is consistent with them.
>
> David
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:50 AM Soni L. <mailto:fakedme%2b...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> What's the story on backwar
Hello,
Is there a possibility to support E164 in X509, for DTLS over SMS?
Thanks.
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
So like a "client" cert is just a way to say "yes I'm really
example.org" yeah?
That seems particularly useful for federated networks (XMPP, etc). Why
not call these server-to-server certs?
On 4/18/23 20:45, Peter Gutmann wrote:
Richard Barnes writes:
>Let's Encrypt issues roughly 3 millio
Has anyone done any work towards tricking a TLS library into providing
cryptographic primitives? We know of similar work with regards to
javacard https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.01662 but not sure if it can be
applied to TLS.
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf
point is to use AES for non-TLS protocols.
On 6/25/23 14:15, Eric Rescorla wrote:
I'm not aware of any. Why would you want to do this? Most such
libraries I am aware of expose low-level primitives or are built on
libraries which do.
-Ekr
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 6:28 AM Soni L. <mail
t with what you would
get if you just used a typical AES library.
-Ekr
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 10:21 AM Soni L. <mailto:fakedme%2b...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Python doesn't expose raw AES, etc. But it does expose a fairly
rich TLS library. Wondering if it would be possible to jus
