Dear all,
tl;dr: We plan on updating RFC 7924 for TLS 1.3 and would like to check
whether there is interest in the TLS wg.
The TLS Cached Information extension [RFC7924] has not seen significant
adoption since its specification.
However, we still believe it to be an interesting candidate in upcom
Hi Dennis,
> Can you expand more on the intended use case? When would it make
sense
> to use a RFC7924-like mechanism over TLS 1.3's session resumption?
>
> I skimmed RFC 7924 and session resumption seems strictly better as
it's
> already widely deployed, allows for the DH handshake to be optio
Hi Dennis,
Am Dienstag, dem 15.08.2023 um 13:20 +0100 schrieb Dennis Jackson:
>
> Two observations:
> >
> > 1. The reason ticket lifetimes are often shorter than 7 days is
> > because they can be used to track user visits. Caching end-entity
> > certificates as in RFC 7924 over a long period
Please ignore that weird German part in the unformatted mail, my mail
client strangely hid it from me in the HTML version.
Best,
Simon
Am Freitag, dem 25.08.2023 um 16:18 +0200 schrieb Simon Mangel:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> Am Dienstag, dem 15.08.2023 um 13:20 +0100 schrieb Denni
